WrestleMania Wrestlemania's Main Events..

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
If Brock/HHH is the co-main event, ahead of Punk/Taker, then the two main events for Mania 29 will both be rematches. How sad.

There literally isn't enough top stars to have fresh main events of Wrestlemania, how far down this company has came...
 

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
Or people need to STFU about rematches and enjoy what is in front of them.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
They're also matches we've only seen once... And technically, Punk/Taker is also a rematch. They fought a couple of times in 2009 as well, though it's a fresher match, of course.

I do prefer that aura of people clashing for the first time, though.
 

RoyalRaven

Fooqy Booqy Biggest Gamer Winner!
Banned
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
3,228
Reaction score
473
Points
0
Age
33
Location
Leicester
I'm pretty hyped to see The Shield at Mania, even though they're probably gonna get buried by Ryberg, Lameus and Blandy Borton. Cena vs Rock only bores me due to predictability (I'll be suprised if the Rock gets hurricarana'd though).
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
seabs said:
Wm 17 had Austin Rock rematch, HHH Taker rematch, the TLC was a rematch... Your point is?

HHH Taker rematch? You mean this year? That wasn't one of the main events.

My point is Wrestlemania main events should be fresh matches, not something we saw the same time last year.
 

BaraaKhalaf92

Champion
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
122
Points
0
Age
32
It is not that rematches are bad, but if the first matches were not so great as they were hyped to be, why go for rematches?
If Rock/Cena was truly "one of the best ever", I wouldn't mind seeing it again, the same thing goes for HHH/Lesnar, You only go for rematches at WM when the first match is so great, which is obviously not the case.
 

AzzaaHandd

Jobber
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
28
I want to go wrestlemania 30 and i want to buy VIP package but it's cheaper if you order with other people, can I order with anyone?!
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
Jonathan said:
HHH Taker rematch? You mean this year? That wasn't one of the main events.

My point is Wrestlemania main events should be fresh matches, not something we saw the same time last year.

WM 17/27/28 they were heavily promoted as one of the main matches on the card,why are you crying about re-matches like they're a new issue? You wouldn't have run with HBK/Taker twice? Hogan vs Andre went back to back Manias... Kane vs Taker was a mania rematch as another example although not back to back admittedly. It's not an excuse to hate on the current state of the product when it's happened throughout, hell Austin Rock would have probably mainevented WM 2000 in some form if it wasn't for his injury(speculation admittedly, but you must admit it is logical)

Also Brock and HHH have never wrestled at Mania before so that complaint is irrelevant to your OP.