WILL WWE EVER GO BACK TO 2 HOURS?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Donald Trump_

WWEF Forums Sickest Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
255
Points
0
Location
LA, Cali
This isn't a question based off of wishful thinking. It's based off of reality. Realisticly, will WWE ever go back to 3 hours with all the money they're making and views that USA is getting? They also have more time to give to superstars and more focus on the low/mid tier.

I think if WWE ever goes back to 2 Hours, it probably won't be for another 2-3 years.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
They'll likely go back by the end of the year. The three hour Raw experiment strikes me as one that will be short-lived.

All the money they're making? If they really were making just so much money off three hours that going back to two hours would be a step back, then why did it take them this long to go to three hours? Vince himself says it even took some persuading from USA before he finally caved in. Also explain why Smackdown hasn't been made three hours as well.
 

Senhor Perfect

Bulletproof
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
21,401
Reaction score
6,655
Points
0
Location
Nibelheim
I'd like them to go to an 8-10 time slot. Then maybe an hour of WWE related programming like a Tough Enough afterward, a show that can be skipped so I can go to bed.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Eventually, I believe so. Not sure when though, but it's true, they're making a ton of money with the 3rd hour due to ads, and from what I understand, USA doesn't really have much else to put on the slot and the first hour is getting better ratings than the previous show that aired then. What I think they should do is not even cut back to two hours, but work in a different way with three. If so, they'd be able to put more people over by giving them prime time exposure, instead of working a three-hour show as if it had two hours. But since I don't think they'll do that, going back to two hours in 2013 seems somewhat likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donald Trump_

Dat Kid1

King of smurf Style
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
22,647
Reaction score
5,892
Points
0
Location
New York, NY
Website
youtube.com
On average Raw is actually 2 hours 40 minutes with maybe 20 minutes of commercials. For a three hour time slot that's not bad for the viewers. Raw is too lengthy for my taste now, especially when they have boring segments. Now I understand the plea to get new talent on the show, but lets be honest. We're more likely to see Miz TV or some AJ segment rather than new talent, so if it's going to be like that I'd rather have Raw go to two hours. I believe part of the problem is the integration of Raw & Smackdown because that means Raw has to make time for those guys as well, which gives less time to the guys lower on the card. I don't think 3 hour Raw is drastically unsuccessful that it needs to be taken back to two hours, but personally I'd prefer it that way.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Ambrose said:
What makes you think that?

The ratings have declined massively, Vince himself has said that 2 hours is too long so no doubt he is against 3 hours, there is lots of criticism around the whole 3 hours, I just don't think the 3 hour format will last as long as people expect. But in this case it is probably best to be pessimistic instead of optimistic.