Why is the heat on Hall...and TNA!?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


chessarmy

Guest
Here is what I dont understand. Why is their heat on Scott Hall AND TNA for no showing the PPV if..

Scott Hall had food poisoning. Do you people understand what that is? Hall definately wouldnt be able to wrestle with food poisoning, he even called and left a voice mail saying that he wouldnt show up. And their is also heat on TNA for this...why? How is it TNA's fault? The PPV was good, the openning match was awsome, Kim/Kong was better than expected, the Feast or Fired was good, the 10,000 match was good (a nice brutal hardcore match...and Raven turned face!), Kaz and Booker vs Cage and Roode was good too. I didnt find any bad match in the PPV except for the Main Event because of the way Hall no showed and the terrible decision to go with Eric Young as the 3rd partner instead of hall.

I hope you guys understand what I am saying here. Sure, the PPV wasnt as good as what TNA has been putting on, but their shouldnt be heat on Hall or TNA for the no show, food poisoning could be dangerous if not treated, and Hall had no choice
 

PeepShow

Guest
Here is what I dont understand. Why is their heat on Scott Hall AND TNA for no showing the PPV if..

Scott Hall had food poisoning. Do you people understand what that is? Hall definately wouldnt be able to wrestle with food poisoning, he even called and left a voice mail saying that he wouldnt show up. And their is also heat on TNA for this...why? How is it TNA's fault? The PPV was good, the openning match was awsome, Kim/Kong was better than expected, the Feast or Fired was good, the 10,000 match was good (a nice brutal hardcore match...and Raven turned face!), Kaz and Booker vs Cage and Roode was good too. I didnt find any bad match in the PPV except for the Main Event because of the way Hall no showed and the terrible decision to go with Eric Young as the 3rd partner instead of hall.

I hope you guys understand what I am saying here. Sure, the PPV wasnt as good as what TNA has been putting on, but their shouldnt be heat on Hall or TNA for the no show, food poisoning could be dangerous if not treated, and Hall had no choice

B/c People have to blaim it on somebody. Hall got enough of the blame, but that wasnt enough, so they had to take it out on the whole company. Its just the way some people are. You'll learn to get used to it...maybe.

And yes, I agee with your match stuff too. Although I wouldnt say the ME sucked. It wasnt as long as expected with Joes fucking sweet shoot....lol, but I was really suprised with Young. He didnt do much, but he looked ok. I didnt like his match with Storm though. That was seriosuly boring. Everything else kept me on the edge of my seat, b/c you people hav to admit, you didnt know who was gunna win 75% of those matches, especially feast or Fired. it was an ok PPV. Prolly 6 or 7 out of 10. Not terrible by any means.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
Stopped reading when you said it was a good PPV.
 

Venom65437

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
40
Location
Cape Coral, Florida
Well if he legitimately had food poisoning, that is one thing. But that was just so convient for it to happen on Sunday...
 
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
616
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
43
^^^agreed.....if it's true....then you can't blame him or TNA but like Peep says people need someone to blame and whoever is closest to the event gets the blame