chessarmy
Guest
Here is what I dont understand. Why is their heat on Scott Hall AND TNA for no showing the PPV if..
Scott Hall had food poisoning. Do you people understand what that is? Hall definately wouldnt be able to wrestle with food poisoning, he even called and left a voice mail saying that he wouldnt show up. And their is also heat on TNA for this...why? How is it TNA's fault? The PPV was good, the openning match was awsome, Kim/Kong was better than expected, the Feast or Fired was good, the 10,000 match was good (a nice brutal hardcore match...and Raven turned face!), Kaz and Booker vs Cage and Roode was good too. I didnt find any bad match in the PPV except for the Main Event because of the way Hall no showed and the terrible decision to go with Eric Young as the 3rd partner instead of hall.
I hope you guys understand what I am saying here. Sure, the PPV wasnt as good as what TNA has been putting on, but their shouldnt be heat on Hall or TNA for the no show, food poisoning could be dangerous if not treated, and Hall had no choice
Scott Hall had food poisoning. Do you people understand what that is? Hall definately wouldnt be able to wrestle with food poisoning, he even called and left a voice mail saying that he wouldnt show up. And their is also heat on TNA for this...why? How is it TNA's fault? The PPV was good, the openning match was awsome, Kim/Kong was better than expected, the Feast or Fired was good, the 10,000 match was good (a nice brutal hardcore match...and Raven turned face!), Kaz and Booker vs Cage and Roode was good too. I didnt find any bad match in the PPV except for the Main Event because of the way Hall no showed and the terrible decision to go with Eric Young as the 3rd partner instead of hall.
I hope you guys understand what I am saying here. Sure, the PPV wasnt as good as what TNA has been putting on, but their shouldnt be heat on Hall or TNA for the no show, food poisoning could be dangerous if not treated, and Hall had no choice