comment and rate and if you like my video please subscribe to my channel. Thank You
Last edited:
More like blatant overbooking to cover up a lack of an actual match card. Same can be said about the battle royal even though I like that idea.
It's still overbooking. There's no reason for Bryan to do them in the same night, he could just do it on the go home show for WM 30. Also, it's not a RR it's a battle royal, as every is in the ring at once, instead of separately entering.HAVE U WATCH WM10!?It work then it will now! The Royal Battle I think I dumb idea even though I like for Adore The Giant all but it basicly a Royal Rumble match at WM the only different u don't get title shot. Most likly Big Show will win b/c he a Giant.
It's still overbooking. There's no reason for Bryan to do them in the same night, he could just do it on the go home show for WM 30. Also, it's not a RR it's a battle royal, as every is in the ring at once, instead of separately entering.
As for the Battle Royal, I imagine it's being done to have more talent appear on the show, instead of making feuds for them to work with due to time constraints. As for the whole overbooking thing, it seems like it, as the card as it stands will be: Cena vs Wyatt, Taker vs Lesnar, Christian vs Sheamus, Bryan vs HHH, Orton vs Batista (possibly Bryan) and the Battle Royal. Seems very underwhelming and there's an extra match with Bryan vs HHH, so if you take that out it leaves 5 matches. That's sad for Wrestlemania.ok still i think waste though. and it going be a Giant who win. So it going either Big Show,Mark Henry, or maybe that new guy with hot chick? also i don't think over booked at all just b/c there 2 matchest with the same guy in it. if anything it will make bryan better come out of WM30 b/c he would have beat HHH and then 2 other guy on the same night to be the wwe world champion iuf that does not make him a main event? then idk what will!?
As for the Battle Royal, I imagine it's being done to have more talent appear on the show, instead of making feuds for them to work with due to time constraints. As for the whole overbooking thing, it seems like it, as the card as it stands will be: Cena vs Wyatt, Taker vs Lesnar, Christian vs Sheamus, Bryan vs HHH, Orton vs Batista (possibly Bryan) and the Battle Royal. Seems very underwhelming and there's an extra match with Bryan vs HHH, so if you take that out it leaves 5 matches. That's sad for Wrestlemania.
It's part of the feud, I imagine they'll face again at Wrestlemania even though they've done multiple matches on Raw and Smackdown, but this time with a stipulation, maybe last man standing or a strap match. Just free thinking though.Uh? Christian vs Sheamus have not watch the list 3 Raws? Christian has lose all 3 time play SD before EC PPV! why have a match at WM if that had all the match on raw were the other has lose then all!? make no sense which piss me off b/c I am fan of Christian! also that got to have aless one mid card title match.
It's part of the feud, I imagine they'll face again at Wrestlemania even though they've done multiple matches on Raw and Smackdown, but this time with a stipulation, maybe last man standing or a strap match. Just free thinking though.
If that was to happen, they'd have to have Big E get into a feud with Ambrose in a matter of weeks, which would be way too rushed, and would make no sense considering they still have the Shield issues prevalent. I've also heard rumors that they want the Shield to face the Ascension and Kane at WM 30, which would be interesting. As for the Christian vs Sheamus bit, they could use something like a last man standing match or a strap match to see who's the better of the two IE making sure one stays down and doesn't get back up or the obvious way of a strap match (mainly mentioned as Sheamus is involved).but that just had that last week on raw it would don't have another one. and I think going mid card title match i heard a rumor that there going unfily the IC and us title at wm30.
If that was to happen, they'd have to have Big E get into a feud with Ambrose in a matter of weeks, which would be way too rushed, and would make no sense considering they still have the Shield issues prevalent. I've also heard rumors that they want the Shield to face the Ascension and Kane at WM 30, which would be interesting. As for the Christian vs Sheamus bit, they could use something like a last man standing match or a strap match to see who's the better of the two IE making sure one stays down and doesn't get back up or the obvious way of a strap match (mainly mentioned as Sheamus is involved).
Why not? With the drought of tag teams in WWE as PTP split up and Real Americans are on the verge of splitting up as well as the Shield, why not call up the Ascension to the main roster and have them win a huge match at WM 30? It boosts their credibility and it continues the dissension of the Shield, as Reigns could cost Ambrose the match, leading to a three way for the US title at Extreme Rules.ok!? no.
Why not? With the drought of tag teams in WWE as PTP split up and Real Americans are on the verge of splitting up as well as the Shield, why not call up the Ascension to the main roster and have them win a huge match at WM 30? It boosts their credibility and it continues the dissension of the Shield, as Reigns could cost Ambrose the match, leading to a three way for the US title at Extreme Rules.