xtremebadass
Guest
Now, with their whole match/stipulation aside, who do you think should retire first in WWE, HBK or Undertaker?
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
LKP
Guest
They should both retire when they think it is time. But as to who first? Well i think taker is more beaten up and in worse shape than HBK so taker. I would not mind seeing them go when they need to.
Id say taker purely for selfish reason. Because HBK IMO is in better shape than taker is right now. HBK hasn't got a boring arse stale gimmick unlike Taker. And i personally think Michaels puts on better matches than Taker.
seX-Power
Guest
They should both retire at Wrestlemania. HBK can lose and then Taker can suffer some sort of career-ending injury.
Michaels.
I've never confessed to being a huge fan of his.
You see, unlike all the pizza faced teenagers jacking off in Mom's basement here, I was around when he had the gimmick of a male stripper.
I've never confessed to being a huge fan of his.
You see, unlike all the pizza faced teenagers jacking off in Mom's basement here, I was around when he had the gimmick of a male stripper.
Great One
Guest
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,879
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 30
Taker burying talent? Yeah right,
*watches SD!'s main event*
Never mind.
Anyways, Undertaker should go first, but he's not so, fuck.
*watches SD!'s main event*
Never mind.
Anyways, Undertaker should go first, but he's not so, fuck.
This is one question that I could go either way on tbh. In one case Shawn Micheals has his bad back, and the Undertaker is beaten up and just looking old. The weird thing is though that these two put on an amazing match at last year's WM, and are poised to give us another unforgetable moment at this year's Mania. I voted for Shawn Micheals to retire first but only because of the stipulations of this match, I'm sure we'll see Shawn wrestle in the wwe again one day.
Qwake
Guest
^^^love seeing ur insecurities about the streak, by mentioning it in a "who should retire first" thread. lol.
I'm gunna say Taker SHOULD. I reckon HBK can put on better matches than Taker atm, with more guys on the rosters. However, I think HBK WILL retire first.
I'm gunna say Taker SHOULD. I reckon HBK can put on better matches than Taker atm, with more guys on the rosters. However, I think HBK WILL retire first.
LadyHotrod
Guest
This is a bit of a tough one because they are both up there in age and fairly beat up but I would rather see HBK go first. Like I've said a few times before, he just doesn't seem to be into it much (though he did seem a little more serious today on SD with his attack on Taker). I just find that Taker always puts 100% into whatever he does, even if he is just walking into the ring to roll his eyes. HBK is a fantastic wrestler, no doubt about it, and he always puts on a good show, but I don't 'feel it' from him lately.
THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps
Guest
After McIntyre was built up as a guy who can take a shitload of punishment and still comeback in his feud with Kane, 'Taker goes out there and McIntyre doesn't come back, instead just getting squashed. How is that not a burial, and make whatever McIntyre had previous achieved, as useless as your post?
In short: 'Taker. Takes off most of the year with injuries, then comes back and takes the title? The fuck outta here.
LadyHotrod
Guest
Don't you think, though, that it could have easily happened to HBK as well, had he said he wanted to hold another title?