http://www.examiner.com/article/wwe-news-brock-lesnar-may-only-wrestle-two-more-times-for-wwe
Referenced : http://411mania.com/wrestling/update-on-wwes-plans-for-brock-lesnar-john-cena-and-roman-reigns/
Saw this article today. I'm not sure I get the logic behind giving the belt to a guy who is never there. Someone has to beat the guy eventually, but if he's never around to impose his will and beat down the opposition all the time is the fact that he is champion as impressive to you when he actually loses it? I get the feeling WWE is trying to hit a 'reset' of sorts on the championship picture by removing the belt from normal 'rotation' for awhile. Right now it's not working that great for me.
Cool that guys like Ziggler get to shine in the meantime though.
Referenced : http://411mania.com/wrestling/update-on-wwes-plans-for-brock-lesnar-john-cena-and-roman-reigns/
Saw this article today. I'm not sure I get the logic behind giving the belt to a guy who is never there. Someone has to beat the guy eventually, but if he's never around to impose his will and beat down the opposition all the time is the fact that he is champion as impressive to you when he actually loses it? I get the feeling WWE is trying to hit a 'reset' of sorts on the championship picture by removing the belt from normal 'rotation' for awhile. Right now it's not working that great for me.
Cool that guys like Ziggler get to shine in the meantime though.