WHC MITB or WWE MITB?

[Roi]

Wich match was better?

 

[Lady Deathbane]

Dude, it's not even worth a poll because it's really no contest, lol.

 

[Aids Johnson]

for personal reasons WWE. Orton won me the betting. The WHC had better spots.

 

[wils172]

I actually liked the WWE one more.. other than the outcome (which I liked so thats a plus for me) IDK why so many people hated the match.. had so many good spots IMO. RVD high off the ladder.. DB and Sheamus with the crowd shouting NO NO NO instead of counting.. Heyman turning on Punk.. Orton's killer RKO high off the ladder.. etc etc

 

[Lady Deathbane]

I actually liked the WWE one more.. other than the outcome (which I liked so thats a plus for me) IDK why so many people hated the match.. had so many good spots IMO. RVD high off the ladder.. DB and Sheamus with the crowd shouting NO NO NO instead of counting.. Heyman turning on Punk.. Orton's killer RKO high off the ladder.. etc etc

Lol, it's not that people hated it, it was really good, I guess most are just mad Bryan didn't win or just prefer WHC match.

 

[Danielson]

Take out Bryan not winning and WHC was still better. All-star one just had more big names - obviously

 

[Aids Johnson]

Take out Bryan not winning and WHC was still better. All-star one just had more big names - obviously

hater. DOnt cry.

 

[Danielson]

hater. DOnt cry.

I question your judgement if you really think WWE MITb was better than WHC on quality alone.

 

[Aids Johnson]

I question your judgement if you really think WWE MITb was better than WHC on quality alone.

no i liked the spots, i literally said the only reason was because orton won me my predictions.

 

[Danielson]

no i liked the spots, i literally said the only reason was because orton won me my predictions.

Then I don't understand your reply.

 

[B.Dazzle]

WHC title was better. Good spots, Rhodes was on fire at the end, great ending.

 

[Aids Johnson]

Then I don't understand your reply.

which one?

for personal reasons WWE. Orton won me the betting. The WHC had better spots.

 

[Lockard 23]

I WOULD say the WHC MITB match was more unpredictable than the WWE MITB match but I guess that would be wrong considering who didn't win the latter lol.

I have to say the WWE one, just because there were more important players involved, and really, what did the WHC MITB offer that the WWE one didn't even in terms of memorable spots or moments? Heyman turning on Punk>Ambrose falling on a bunch of people.

I think Sandow winning did please me more than Orton, especially since it means a talent I like (both in-ring and character wise) is getting a push and so is Cody Rhodes it seems, but overall, I was still more emotionally involved in the WWE one. It just felt overall more important, being an All-Stars match and the final match of the card and for a shot at the WWE Title, a belt more prestigious than the WHC.

 

[Danielson]

which one?

When you said don't cry. I said even if DB would have won WHC still would have been better essentially.

 

[Aids Johnson]

Take out Bryan not winning and WHC was still better. All-star one just had more big names - obviously

oh this? yeah my reply was just to be a dick. Wasnt the first time, wont be the last