Was watching ESPN earlier and they ran an add for a boxing match, Manny Manny Pacquiao (sp?) vs Timothy Bradley. Pacquiao's the barely-disputed number one pound-for-pound boxer in the world, but Bradley's unbeaten, 28-0. You'd like to say Pacquiao's unbeatable, but this young guy hasn't been beaten albeit against weaker opposition.
So, lets take this scenario into WWE. Daniel Bryan wins the WWE Championship at No Way Out, defends it against Punk one-on-one at MITB, shockingly taps out Cena at Summerslam, and has all the momentum in the world. So what if the still-unbeaten Ryback challenged Daniel Bryan at Night of Champions? Bryan would obviously seem like the favorite, but from a casuals' point of view, we haven't seen a reason to believe Ryback can't win. What would you think about a scenario like this?
So, lets take this scenario into WWE. Daniel Bryan wins the WWE Championship at No Way Out, defends it against Punk one-on-one at MITB, shockingly taps out Cena at Summerslam, and has all the momentum in the world. So what if the still-unbeaten Ryback challenged Daniel Bryan at Night of Champions? Bryan would obviously seem like the favorite, but from a casuals' point of view, we haven't seen a reason to believe Ryback can't win. What would you think about a scenario like this?