What was the last great idea/angle that WWE didn't fuck up?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
I know how bad this is gonna sound, but I think twice in a lifetime was done the best way they could. Having Cena built up for this grand match against The Rock, then losing and having to "work" his way up again. He then proceeds to win the Royal Rumble, and Rock wins the WWE Championship, thus setting the reason for their rematch. The promos weren't the greatest thing in the world, but WWE didn't fuck up the storyline in my opinion.

Agreed. I had no issue with them doing a rematch either because there was still huge money to make off the feud, and the way they booked it was perfectly logical.

As for the topic, I honestly can't think of many big angles in the past 4-5 years where there wasn't at least some flaw (although perhaps maybe a little of that is down to my own nitpicking, which I seem to have a problem with), but The Shield angle is one where things have been booked great for the most part. The beginning with them being booked to go over everyone was perfect and while many of us felt them winning the championships was a step down for the group, the way Rollins and Reigns ended up putting over Cody and Goldust huge by dropping the tag team titles to them made the belts being in the group feel like they had purpose. As long as the breakup of the group is handled right (and so far it is), then all will be dandy for this one.