What smackdown should have done

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


shefflad

Member
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
37
when smackdown had that 20 man batal royle for the WHC, instead of khali winning, they should have brought kennedy or lashley over from raw and have one of those guys winning it instead of khali. with lashley or kennedy as champ they would have had alot better feuds and will make good whc in the future. Khali will hold the title for a very long time. the only man who can beat khali is the taker
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
112
Location
PA, US
No. Neither Lashley nor Kennedy is ready for a world title reign yet. They may be someday but you can't make the mistake of pushing them too early. Have Kennedy win a midcard title first, then you can think about pushing him for a world title.

As for Khali, well I hate him but at least hes a credible champion.
 
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
987
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
34
Location
Ontario, Canada
Kennedy should of went to Smackdown and win it like kurtangle did and he can take edge's place because hes heel.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
Mr. Kennedy was ready to be champion. At least when he was at Smackdown as Mr. Money in the Bamnk. The injury mantained him hot, but Raw is kind of burying him. It would have made sense he returning at the Battle Royal, winning and the next show say he was feeling screwed.

Why would Lashley return to Smackdown, maybe King Booker would had returned at the Battle Royal?
 

Truth

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
552
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
philly
No, nobody should have been brought over since this champ is only temporary. I think Batista should have won it then defended it in the triple threat and retained then lose it to Kane at unforgiven. Kane would then go into a face/face program with Undertaker, Edge comes back around December where he takes it from Undertaker. And you just continue there program to Wm24.
 

MikeRaw

Guest
OMG...It would be pointless...HJow can you explain Lashley just appearing on Smackdown?Especially just after the draft...Edge did it cause he was Money In The Bank so there was an explanation but after they both get drafted to Raw it wouldnt make sense for them to run right back...
 

The Ripper

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
995
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
35
^^Your forgetting Lashley just turned up on ecw and took a place for the elimanation chamber without explination
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
388
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
33
Location
Brampton Canada..eh
It doesn't matter what they should have done anymore what happened in the past should stay in the past.
Face the facts, Khali is the WHC and there is nothing any of us can do about it. I say stop trying to think about the past and look up to the future. For example who will take the WHC from Khali? Is it Batista, Edge or Taker. I don't know but I want to find out.
 

samborambo

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
47
I don't think it will be batista as they would have had him win the battle royal in the first place. I think they will Stick with Khali until Taker/Edge return. They seem to be pushing Khali what with the new move/finisher.
 

Switchy

Active Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
44
Location
Bristol, England
Khali still got another month or 2 with the title until either Batista or Kane takes it of him. Maybe even have him hold the title until unforgien and let him drop it to 'Taker, give hi the title run he should've had but he got screwed by his arm.
 

straight_edge76

Guest
Khali was really the only good choice for WHC, look at all the other possible contenders; Batista has already gotten like 6 title shots since Wrestlemania, Kane & Flair have jobbed everyone since like 2003, Matt Hardy, & Finley aren't ready to main event, Mark Henry hasn't beaten any credible challengers since taking out Undertaker & MVP isn't quite ready for a WHC run. Khali though, as much as I hate him really has been nearly undefeated since he came to the WWE.
 

tasso10

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
38
Location
Sydney, Australia
^ENOUGH. Hardy is NOT worthy yet. He will be someday soon

Lashley, Kennedy and Booker should NOT have waltzed into Smackdown and win the title. They jus moved to Raw for crying out loud. Possibly if an established Raw star like Umaga then that could be a maybe
 

reaction

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
37
Location
that place
i tink WWE shod hav had a surprise winner som1 unexspecting cos to be honest it was obvious either Kane Batista or Khali was going to win but a surprise winner would have been better like a cruiser weight or some thing ju8st to spice things up
 

tasso10

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
38
Location
Sydney, Australia
^ARE U KIDDING? A CRUISERWEIGHT? man no way. The only Cruiserweight who can be credible would be Rey. Due to his time in business, experience and of course him being a former champion.