Every time someone bitches about TNA's booking and talent and whatnot, they're always so vague. You say you want "more entertaining storylines." What exactly are "entertaining storylines." You want "more interesting stables like SEX." What are "interesting stables?" You want "an alternative to WWE, not a copycat." What exactly do you mean by "alternative?" Give me some freakin' definitions, something that I, and any hypothetical TNA officials who ...might... be reading the Internet looking for feedback about the product, might actually be able to use. Be specific for God's sake!
What do you want from TNA?
- Thread starter dstebbins
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
PeepShow
Guest
Well, to me, it's not that hard. They need to be putting on shows and PPV's like they did on 05 and beginning of 06. Combine that with getting new talent and pushing new ones. Also as I've been saying they need to get a more serious approach and cut the crap segments with Angle and shit. I mean he can still have a couple per show, but not the normal 4 or 5. It's just so overused.
EDIT- Oh, did I mention get new bookers. IE: Fire Mantel and Russo and Hire Heyman and well, they should have kept Dusty Rhodes
EDIT- Oh, did I mention get new bookers. IE: Fire Mantel and Russo and Hire Heyman and well, they should have kept Dusty Rhodes
C4
Guest
What I want from TNA? Here is a quick list brother:
1) Better Storylines (And that means less stupid segments)
2) Better Womens Division (Gail Kim is the only women 'wrestler' in there)
3) Longer Matches, Better Matches.
4) No throwing BookerT in the midcard.
1) Better Storylines (And that means less stupid segments)
2) Better Womens Division (Gail Kim is the only women 'wrestler' in there)
3) Longer Matches, Better Matches.
4) No throwing BookerT in the midcard.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 1,955
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 37
- Location
- St. Catharines, Ontario
I have no problem with the storylines, and no major problem with the booking (though it'd be nice to have one PPV title match not end with outside help). I want them to stop going on this ridiculous delusion that signing random obscure people is going to increase ratings.
NOBODY GIVES A FLYING FUCKAROO ABOUT PACMAN JONES.
If they want to increase ratings, stop signing these nobodies, save up all that money, and drop TNA flyers from the Goodyear blimp at the Superbowl. Perhaps that would cost too much, but you get what i'm saying. I want TNA to actually ADVERTISE, rather than seemingly going out of their way to never be as big as WWE. Filing copyright complaints on youtube videos of meaningless matches like Roxxi against Brooks from seven months ago? Spending god knows how much on a stripper-beating football player with a no-contact clause? It's like they're TRYING to waste money and going out of their way to not get their name out.
NOBODY GIVES A FLYING FUCKAROO ABOUT PACMAN JONES.
If they want to increase ratings, stop signing these nobodies, save up all that money, and drop TNA flyers from the Goodyear blimp at the Superbowl. Perhaps that would cost too much, but you get what i'm saying. I want TNA to actually ADVERTISE, rather than seemingly going out of their way to never be as big as WWE. Filing copyright complaints on youtube videos of meaningless matches like Roxxi against Brooks from seven months ago? Spending god knows how much on a stripper-beating football player with a no-contact clause? It's like they're TRYING to waste money and going out of their way to not get their name out.
Dude, you're doing the exact thing I asked you not to do. You're being vague and not giving anything useful. You say you want better storylines and that means "less stupid segments." What is so stupid about these segments that they put on, and how can TNA improve them?
For the love of God, give me something I can USE!
THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps
Guest
i want no more continous ref bumps in the m,ain event of every freaking ppv. no more stupid angle segments. longer matches. pushing of younger wrestlers who desreve the chance (not kevin nash)
LKP
Guest
I would get heyman asap. Then id give people who have silly angles serious ones. Id gave aj a good proper face run his heel act shows he has that side to him but for me its not over enough. People will still cheer what he does high flying moves. They make people look awesome and invincible one wekk then next week silly aka black reign, rhino, robert roode and joe. And add more thigns like they are doing with joe and tomko now iam really into those two at the moment. Plus eric young needs a new attittude.
Id like them not to suck, thats the short version.
Long version....
Less spot show booking
Less wasting time with celebs
Clearly defined heels and faces
Characters who have an actual character not a gimmick
Rehire Raven to book
Get rid of Russo
Let Cornette have more creative control because he obviously has none
Stop trying to be innovative with match types, different doesnt always equal good
Better promos
Stop shitting all over your titles
Long version....
Less spot show booking
Less wasting time with celebs
Clearly defined heels and faces
Characters who have an actual character not a gimmick
Rehire Raven to book
Get rid of Russo
Let Cornette have more creative control because he obviously has none
Stop trying to be innovative with match types, different doesnt always equal good
Better promos
Stop shitting all over your titles
I don't understand how people can complain about TNA and/or WWE on a regular basis. Its pretty easy to turn the station, and not watch. Pick up the remote, press a few buttons, and there you go. Its really simple.
Why do people complain about a product and still watch it? Are you guys Blue :laugh: I sometimes complain about things, but I'm not constantly doing it. If you don't like it, stop watching it. When it starts to improve, pay attention again. Thats what I do, you guys should try it. It certainly makes more sense than paying attention to something you hate, only to come online and talk about how bad it is.
...Sharpton for president *drops mic*
Why do people complain about a product and still watch it? Are you guys Blue :laugh: I sometimes complain about things, but I'm not constantly doing it. If you don't like it, stop watching it. When it starts to improve, pay attention again. Thats what I do, you guys should try it. It certainly makes more sense than paying attention to something you hate, only to come online and talk about how bad it is.
...Sharpton for president *drops mic*
That doesnt make any sense. You either complain about something, or you dont. There are no varying degrees of bitching. You can bitch sometimes, like me because I dont watch TNA every week, but youre still bitching. So either bitch, or dont bitch, there is no inbetween.
Wait...what? You're saying either make threads praising TNA, or make threads bashing them? People shouldn't stop watching something they don't like, they should continue to watch it for bashing purposes? If I hear a movie sucks, I'm not going to go buy tickets just so I can bash it along with the others, it doesn't make any sense lol. I used to watch UFC Fight Night, but now I find it pretty boring and I choose not to watch it. Instead, should I continue to watch it, and bash it because I find it boring? Should I make a bunch of threads entitled "UFC sucks!" where I express my hatred towards them
? :_cling_: