Vickie's role is pointless, repetitive and unneeded

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Vickie Guerrero as GM (or executive consultant or whatever it's called) is the most needless thing I have seen for a while. Fair enough Vickie gets the most heat on RAW, but I guarantee most of the boo's are from people who are literally fed up of hearing her scream down the mic. It's great if she has one mic segment a night, but she's involved in MANY segments now and it's the same old thing.

With Vince simply appearing and making her look incapable of making a decision without his input, it makes the audience think "Why the fuck did he appoint her as consultant then?". Furthermore, what revolutionary decisions has she made that actually warrants a GM? She's not involved in any big storylines is she? Or are they still doing the Claire Lynch AJ/Cena story? If they are, it hasn't been mentioned for a while now.

The whole ordeal reeks of WWE having no idea who to fill this role, or that they have an idea who to fill it but they are currently unavailable (Flair), but at the moment there is no need for a GM if Vince is there every week. I'm one of the few fans of Vickie on here but the constant mic time she gets has quickly turned me into a hater - similar to AJ being GM - and I simply mute the stream whenever she's on. This is my rant, but what do you think about her in this role and the amount of air-time she's getting?
 

Lady Deathbane

thanks for the unban, lmao
Joined
Oct 4, 2012
Messages
16,848
Reaction score
2,391
Points
118
Location
Bay Area 51, CA
Website
www.instagram.com
Crayo said:
Vickie Guerrero as GM (or executive consultant or whatever it's called) is the most needless thing I have seen for a while. Fair enough Vickie gets the most heat on RAW, but I guarantee most of the boo's are from people who are literally fed up of hearing her scream down the mic. It's great if she has one mic segment a night, but she's involved in MANY segments now and it's the same old thing.

With Vince simply appearing and making her look incapable of making a decision without his input, it makes the audience think "Why the fuck did he appoint her as consultant then?". Furthermore, what revolutionary decisions has she made that actually warrants a GM? She's not involved in any big storylines is she? Or are they still doing the Claire Lynch AJ/Cena story? If they are, it hasn't been mentioned for a while now.

The whole ordeal reeks of WWE having no idea who to fill this role, or that they have an idea who to fill it but they are currently unavailable (Flair), but at the moment there is no need for a GM if Vince is there every week. I'm one of the few fans of Vickie on here but the constant mic time she gets has quickly turned me into a hater - similar to AJ being GM - and I simply mute the stream whenever she's on. This is my rant, but what do you think about her in this role and the amount of air-time she's getting?

Well, Vince even said the same night when Vickie was appointed this position that he didn't even know what the position exactly was and that he didn't really have any control over it, assumingly.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
RE: Vickie's role is pointless, repetitive and needless.

I read the results of Raw and found it funny that Vince has now done this for the third time in the last 4-5 weeks - came out and 'ordered' Vickie to change things. What's the purpose of there being a GM if Vince is gonna just come out there to change shit anyway? It seems the only reason they have her on the show right now is just for the AJ/Cena storyline but she doesn't need to be the GM for that.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Lady Deathbane said:
Well, Vince even said the same night when Vickie was appointed this position that he didn't even know what the position exactly was and that he didn't really have any control over it, assumingly.

WWE always reference Vince being above the board of directors but he was removed from his position... from the board of directors... Awkward I know. But yeah he easily has kayfabe control over Vickie, he appointed her himself didn't he?

KevinLockard23 said:
I read the results of Raw and found it funny that Vince has now done this for the third time in the last 4-5 weeks - came out and 'ordered' Vickie to change things. What's the purpose of there being a GM if Vince is gonna just come out there to change shit anyway? It seems the only reason they have her on the show right now is just for the AJ/Cena storyline but she doesn't need to be the GM for that.

Completely agree.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
I agree. However, I think it's just filler for Flair, it's the only explanation I can come up with. Maybe even filler for Johnny? I don't know. And I think they did it even with Vince being there every week because when they decided it they didn't want McMahon to be there every week, which must've happened because he saw the ratings one week and decided to show up on the other. So I'll say that they're waiting for Flair.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Crayo said:
WWE always reference Vince being above the board of directors but he was removed from his position... from the board of directors... Awkward I know. But yeah he easily has kayfabe control over Vickie, he appointed her himself didn't he?


Completely agree.

I don't think he was released as the Chairman. I didn't watch the promo myself but I think he was just released of his duties as far as running Raw goes. But was still the Chairman, or something like that.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
Re: RE: Vickie's role is pointless, repetitive and unneeded

Leo C said:
I don't think he was released as the Chairman. I didn't watch the promo myself but I think he was just released of his duties as far as running Raw goes. But was still the Chairman, or something like that.

I think this was it and is the reason he could sack HHH as the board requested or some buggery.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Leo C said:
I don't think he was released as the Chairman. I didn't watch the promo myself but I think he was just released of his duties as far as running Raw goes. But was still the Chairman, or something like that.

Yeah he was removed from his position, by the board of directors, who WWE have mentioned are below Vince... It's confusing right? Lol.
 

DarksideTrin

This meal is so unfinished EA tried to publish it!
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
149
Points
0
Vicky has a job or life though. Vince promised to take care of eddies family after his death.

You are stuck with her forevah
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Leaping Lanny Poffo said:
Vicky has a job or life though. Vince promised to take care of eddies family after his death.

You are stuck with her forevah

I am not a Vickie hater (despite me saying I turned into one), she does her job very well. I'm hating on how WWE are using her.
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Crayo said:
Yeah he was removed from his position, by the board of directors, who WWE have mentioned are below Vince... It's confusing right? Lol.
He was relieved of his duties of the day to day running of WWE (aka COO) - Not chairman.

WWE don't explain their story well :nope:
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Jonathan said:
He was relieved of his duties of the day to day running of WWE (aka COO) - Not chairman.

WWE don't explain their story well :nope:

I know, I meant his position of running RAW. I've not once said he was removed as Chairman. There is just so many loop holes in that story.
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Crayo said:
I know, I meant his position of running RAW. I've not once said he was removed as Chairman. There is just so many loop holes in that story.

Ah, your post is about as confusing as WWE storylines :true: