Update on Taker's status

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Senhor Perfect

Bulletproof
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
21,401
Reaction score
6,655
Points
0
Location
Nibelheim
Regarding The Undertaker's status, there is still nothing definite. If there has been a final decision made, it is being kept very quiet.

As noted, Taker was not backstage at Monday's RAW from Nashville, even though he was photographed at a Nashville Predators hockey game the night before. However, Taker reportedly did have a meeting with Vince McMahon while in town.

It's said that Taker does not want to come back and have to fake his way through a mediocre match, which is why his status is up in the air. He had major shoulder and hip surgery over the past year which made it impossible for him to do any serious training for a long time. Taker couldn't lift upper body because of shoulder rehab and couldn't do lower body because of the hip rehab.

As of a few days ago, the internal word was that Taker is still "planned" to face CM Punk this year. People close to Taker believe that if he doesn't do WrestleMania 29, then his career is not over and it would simply mean he didn't have enough time to fully recover from everything. The expectation is that he would like to do WrestleMania 30 in 2014 and that the show could be built around his farewell since he will be 49 years old at that point.
Read more at http://www.lordsofpain.net/

If true that means he's planning on finishing 21-0 or 20-1, it just doesn't feel right.
 

Danielson

Champion
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
27,213
Reaction score
5,799
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Website
twitter.com
Now the debate will start, does punk deserve to beat taker?

Does anyone for that matter?

This could get interesting.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Lol who cares if it's 21 or 20 -- the higher the better imo. Glad to see he's expected to be there next year. I'd rather him not be at this years Wrestlemania to be honest.
 

Senhor Perfect

Bulletproof
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
21,401
Reaction score
6,655
Points
0
Location
Nibelheim
Crayo said:
Lol who cares if it's 21 or 20 -- the higher the better imo. Glad to see he's expected to be there next year. I'd rather him not be at this years Wrestlemania to be honest.

I LIKE ROUND NUMBERS! :ANGRY:
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Senhor Perfect said:
I LIKE ROUND NUMBERS! :ANGRY:

To be fair I think it'd drive my OCD insane, but I would rather see Taker one more time in an angle I'm interested in. Taker/HHH for the last two years has sucked for me (apart from the matches).
 

Roi

Champion
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
9,978
Reaction score
1,768
Points
0
Age
28
Location
Spain
It's said that Taker does not want to come back and have to fake his way through a mediocre match, which is why his status is up in the air.



:boss:


Punk mark and I dont want im to finish the streak
 

Dat Kid1

King of smurf Style
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
22,647
Reaction score
5,892
Points
0
Location
New York, NY
Website
youtube.com
I don't think Taker'll face Punk at next year's Wrestlemania because I thought there was plans for him to face Austin at next year's mania. I could see Taker taking on Lesnar since Taker never got to fight Brock again because of an injury he sustained a couple years ago.
 

GeeTeaIye

The Lunatic Fringe
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
237
Points
0
Location
Bucharest
I would suggest Taker vs Lesnar but that would be torture for Taker.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Well, if he doesn't work this year, I'm alright with it. I guess we can already start discussing Taker/Cena at 30 then.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
Him finishing at 21-0 or 20-1 makes sense. The idea that he's made it to 20-0 and now he has one last match to see whether he can go one number past the 20-0 milestone or not. If he fights both this year and next, then going to 22-0 is a bit weird but who cares about the number anyway.

I'm sure Taker could handle a match with Brock considering his last two matches with HHH were also very physical. But whether he fights this year or not, I think Wrestlemania 30 will definitely be when he hangs them up. It fits well with it being the 30th year annual Wrestlemania event and all.
 

Danielson

Champion
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
27,213
Reaction score
5,799
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Website
twitter.com
I've put no consideration in the fact that it'd be 21-0 . I didn't think that it would matter if it's a round number or not, it's one of, if not the greatest accomplishments in professional wrestling. I wonder if they drew it up that way in the beginning.
 

catlady

The People's Champion
Main Eventer
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
15,849
Reaction score
2,005
Points
0
Punk has come a long way but for HBK not to beat him and Punk beat him... I am a huge Punk fan and that don't seem right.
 

Senhor Perfect

Bulletproof
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
21,401
Reaction score
6,655
Points
0
Location
Nibelheim
Danielson said:
I've put no consideration in the fact that it'd be 21-0 . I didn't think that it would matter if it's a round number or not, it's one of, if not the greatest accomplishments in professional wrestling. I wonder if they drew it up that way in the beginning.

His first few opponents were shit so he had to go over, then they probably realized he hadn't lost a bunch and decided to make it a streak.