TWC ATH Wrestling #1

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
Welcome to TWC Around The Horn for the 1st wrestling edition. No eliminations will be made in the 1st round but in the 2nd round there will be. So be sure to try and get as many points you can. There is no limit as to how many rebuttals you can do.

1. RONDO
2. Kairi
3. Reid
4. Baller

1st Topic
Currently Wade Barrett who was the leader of Nexus is in a interesting position at the moment. He is at the what's next road for him and has quite a few options. Question is if it was up to you what would you do with Wade Barrett and why do you think that would be the best route for WWE to go with him?

Deadline
Tuesday Jan 4th 11:59 pm Pacific time.
 

SAL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
64
Points
48
Location
BOSTON
I see Baller's in the thread too. If he gets something in first, I won't see it. Just don't want him to think I'm ignoring his argument.

Before we talk about what to do with Barrett, we have to decide what we want to achieve with him. Some people think he's a midcarder for life now that the Cena angle's over. Some people want him to keep the momentum he got from main-eventing two PPVs against the WWE's biggest star. You can count me in the second group. I am concerned about killing Wade's momentum, as he could quickly become an afterthought.

The first thing you need to do is find a way to get Barrett away from Raw. I guess he could stick around there for a short time and play a small role in this new Punk/Nexus/Cena angle, but what can they do really? Have him play second-fiddle and take a step back in Nexus? I can't see it. If he was a middling member to begin with, fine, but going from the leader to a supporting player would be the death of his push. Nexus was ALL about Barrett for 6 months, and it would just be goofy to keep him in this angle and make him an afterthought.

So herein lies the problem. We won't have a draft for a few months. Should we have Barrett sell his injuries from the Cena match at TLC? If that's what they're planning on, I wish they came up with something better than laying him under a wooden bed and dropping chairs on it, because that doesn't cut it for me. Maybe the best move is to have Nexus "exile" him. They can say his name a few times, keeping him in the fans' minds, and talk about how Punk's a better leader. Barrett could then make a short-term return (maybe in the build to WM?), briefly helping Cena. Then, get him to Smackdown as quickly as possible.

On Smackdown, Barrett can just be himself. He can play face if he gets over enough during the Cena/Nexus deal, but it would be very easy to turn him back heel. Have him go after Mysterio or Kofi or someone, and he's a megaheel instantly. From there, he can keep winning matches on his own and work toward becoming a legitimate main-eventer. The Nexus angle got him the spotlight. Now he needs the credibility. Smackdown is the perfect place for that.
 

Reid

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Age
34
If i were the wwe i'd have Barret sell his injuries from TLC for a while. i know that it seemed like a lame way to take someone out, but that what they did. I agree with RONDO that playing Robin to Punk's Batman would ruin his credibility. The Nexus could mention him in passing demeaning him and talking trash about they never liked him.

I would have him return sometime around Elimination chamber to help Cena. His motivation for helping was the altamatum Nexus gave a couple weeks before tlc where if he didn't bring back cena he'd be kicked out, and the beratting and trash talking he had to endure for the month or so afterward. for Wrestlemania i'd have Cena/Barret take on the Nexus in a handicapped match.

After Wrestlemania you can always have a rematch, or a indivisual match with a member of Nexus. Even iwht the draft still a ways off after Wrstlemania, there is no reason they can't do a trade.

I agree with RONDO also on Barret going to Smackdown to freshen him up a bit, he'd be able to be heel again by attacking the aforementioned superstars. or he could be in some mid card feuds as a face with Ziggler and Swagger. Eventually this could lead a WHC title match.
 

Kairi

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
6,483
Reaction score
2
Points
38
I had a completely different argument I was going to toss up, but after seeing Raw last night I'm going to go with this one.


I agree it is best to look at it as as "what do they want to achieve" perspect. I even attend to agree that taking Barrett to smackdown would freshen him up, as far as character because it opens up so many doors as far as fueds, and Nexus did help Kane bury Undertaker, who is a big possibility for Barrett to fued with, if that is considered, as I do not know if they ever really explained that, but if they did, Taker could still set out for his revenge.


However after seeing Raw last night, and bitching at PHX about how I did not want to see Cena/Nexus version two just with a different guy (Punk) as a leader, he said something that I think applies to this situation. You can't just put all this time into building up a guy and then do nothing with it.


I feel that is why they chose to keep Barrett on Raw and why If it was up to me, I would have done the same. Yes it appears Punk came in as Nexus "begged" him to be the leader and with the beatings they took from Barrett, because of his issues with Cena, I could see the group turning on him and looking for a new leader, but that does not mean that Barrett himself would stop trying to go after the world championship.


I would keep him on raw, at least for a couple more months that way I could completely break him away from Nexus, before I would eventually push for him to go on SD and see what type of fued he could build up there. When I sent him to SD, I would also give him a mini push, as the guy is the winner of the first ever season of NXT, and even though it does not mean much, if it were not for that, he would not be anyone at all, so giving him a mini push on SD to go along with the huge push he has had on Raw, would be a nice balance, before if I didn't feel there was nothing else for him to do, slowly putting him in the background.


Reason why I feel this would be the best route for him is because it gives him exposure on both shows, also gives him a chance to fued with some of the big names on both brands, and gives the WWE backstage creatives a chance to see how he can work under different circumstances, which I am sure they are already interested in seeing.
 

Baller

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2010
Messages
849
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Well since WWE has already taken the first step with Mr. Barrett, and that was the best step and that is to separate Wade Barrett from the Nexus. Since entering the main event picture Wade Barrett has looked weak in trying to stick with the top dogs and has really yet to win a cleanly for all I can remember. Yes heels are suppose to cheat some times to win matches a la Miz, however even Miz won cleanly as he showed last night, something Wade Barrett lacked. Separating himself from Nexus will only be the first step as now he can prove he can stick with the top dogs on RAW as he did last night in the cage match.

Next, he needs to start the feud with Undertaker on the road to Wrestlemania. Face it, a face wade Barrett would not work at this time simply for the fact of what he has done to john cena in the past couple months, and I don't think the "WWE Universe" will accept Barrett as a face. So what to do wtih Barrett since he has already feuded with Cena and Orton? The Undertaker is your answer here. The seed has already been planted with helping Kane bury Taker, and since it is the Road to Mania more interbrand matches will occur so Barrett can stick on RAW until the draft while still feuding Taker. Give Barrett a win or two on live t.v. and even play mind games with Taker and have him dominate the feud and give him some cred. Even if he loses the feud with Taker if he can stick with him toe to toe, then we all know Wade Barrett is a long term stay in the main event.
 

SAL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
64
Points
48
Location
BOSTON
Was gonna rebut, but we're near the deadline and we're all pretty much in agreement. So, in conclusion:

1399380_o.gif
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
I see Baller's in the thread too. If he gets something in first, I won't see it. Just don't want him to think I'm ignoring his argument.

Before we talk about what to do with Barrett, we have to decide what we want to achieve with him. Some people think he's a midcarder for life now that the Cena angle's over. Some people want him to keep the momentum he got from main-eventing two PPVs against the WWE's biggest star. You can count me in the second group. I am concerned about killing Wade's momentum, as he could quickly become an afterthought.

The first thing you need to do is find a way to get Barrett away from Raw. I guess he could stick around there for a short time and play a small role in this new Punk/Nexus/Cena angle, but what can they do really? Have him play second-fiddle and take a step back in Nexus? I can't see it. If he was a middling member to begin with, fine, but going from the leader to a supporting player would be the death of his push. Nexus was ALL about Barrett for 6 months, and it would just be goofy to keep him in this angle and make him an afterthought. (+2)

So herein lies the problem. We won't have a draft for a few months. Should we have Barrett sell his injuries from the Cena match at TLC? If that's what they're planning on, I wish they came up with something better than laying him under a wooden bed and dropping chairs on it, because that doesn't cut it for me. Maybe the best move is to have Nexus "exile" him. They can say his name a few times, keeping him in the fans' minds, and talk about how Punk's a better leader. Barrett could then make a short-term return (maybe in the build to WM?), briefly helping Cena. Then, get him to Smackdown as quickly as possible. (+2 not a bad idea as getting him away from Raw right now is the smart thing to do)

On Smackdown, Barrett can just be himself. He can play face if he gets over enough during the Cena/Nexus deal, but it would be very easy to turn him back heel. Have him go after Mysterio or Kofi or someone, and he's a megaheel instantly. From there, he can keep winning matches on his own and work toward becoming a legitimate main-eventer. The Nexus angle got him the spotlight. Now he needs the credibility. Smackdown is the perfect place for that. (+1)

If i were the wwe i'd have Barret sell his injuries from TLC for a while. i know that it seemed like a lame way to take someone out, but that what they did. I agree with RONDO that playing Robin to Punk's Batman would ruin his credibility. The Nexus could mention him in passing demeaning him and talking trash about they never liked him. (+2)

I would have him return sometime around Elimination chamber to help Cena. His motivation for helping was the altamatum Nexus gave a couple weeks before tlc where if he didn't bring back cena he'd be kicked out, and the beratting and trash talking he had to endure for the month or so afterward. for Wrestlemania i'd have Cena/Barret take on the Nexus in a handicapped match. (+1)

After Wrestlemania you can always have a rematch, or a indivisual match with a member of Nexus. Even iwht the draft still a ways off after Wrstlemania, there is no reason they can't do a trade. (+2 glad the idea of a trade was brought up when it came to how to move Barrett to Smackdown)

I agree with RONDO also on Barret going to Smackdown to freshen him up a bit, he'd be able to be heel again by attacking the aforementioned superstars. or he could be in some mid card feuds as a face with Ziggler and Swagger. Eventually this could lead a WHC title match.

I had a completely different argument I was going to toss up, but after seeing Raw last night I'm going to go with this one.


I agree it is best to look at it as as "what do they want to achieve" perspect. I even attend to agree that taking Barrett to smackdown would freshen him up, as far as character because it opens up so many doors as far as fueds, and Nexus did help Kane bury Undertaker, who is a big possibility for Barrett to fued with, if that is considered, as I do not know if they ever really explained that, but if they did, Taker could still set out for his revenge. (+2 for bringing up the feud with Taker possibility)


However after seeing Raw last night, and bitching at PHX about how I did not want to see Cena/Nexus version two just with a different guy (Punk) as a leader, he said something that I think applies to this situation. You can't just put all this time into building up a guy and then do nothing with it.


I feel that is why they chose to keep Barrett on Raw and why If it was up to me, I would have done the same. Yes it appears Punk came in as Nexus "begged" him to be the leader and with the beatings they took from Barrett, because of his issues with Cena, I could see the group turning on him and looking for a new leader, but that does not mean that Barrett himself would stop trying to go after the world championship.


I would keep him on raw, at least for a couple more months that way I could completely break him away from Nexus, before I would eventually push for him to go on SD and see what type of fued he could build up there. (+1) When I sent him to SD, I would also give him a mini push, as the guy is the winner of the first ever season of NXT, and even though it does not mean much, if it were not for that, he would not be anyone at all, so giving him a mini push on SD to go along with the huge push he has had on Raw, would be a nice balance, before if I didn't feel there was nothing else for him to do, slowly putting him in the background.


Reason why I feel this would be the best route for him is because it gives him exposure on both shows, also gives him a chance to fued with some of the big names on both brands, and gives the WWE backstage creatives a chance to see how he can work under different circumstances, which I am sure they are already interested in seeing. (+1)

Well since WWE has already taken the first step with Mr. Barrett, and that was the best step and that is to separate Wade Barrett from the Nexus. Since entering the main event picture Wade Barrett has looked weak in trying to stick with the top dogs and has really yet to win a cleanly for all I can remember. Yes heels are suppose to cheat some times to win matches a la Miz, however even Miz won cleanly as he showed last night, something Wade Barrett lacked. Separating himself from Nexus will only be the first step as now he can prove he can stick with the top dogs on RAW as he did last night in the cage match. (+1)

Next, he needs to start the feud with Undertaker on the road to Wrestlemania. Face it, a face wade Barrett would not work at this time simply for the fact of what he has done to john cena in the past couple months, and I don't think the "WWE Universe" will accept Barrett as a face (+2 great point on why he wouldn't be accepted as a face after doing what he did to the poster child). So what to do wtih Barrett since he has already feuded with Cena and Orton? The Undertaker is your answer here. The seed has already been planted with helping Kane bury Taker, and since it is the Road to Mania more interbrand matches will occur so Barrett can stick on RAW until the draft while still feuding Taker. Give Barrett a win or two on live t.v. and even play mind games with Taker and have him dominate the feud and give him some cred. Even if he loses the feud with Taker if he can stick with him toe to toe, then we all know Wade Barrett is a long term stay in the main event. (+2)
1. RONDO: 5
2. Kairi: 4
3. Reid: 5
4. Baller: 5
---------
Round 1 is over and now on round 2 the 1st elimination will be made.

2nd Topic:
Smackdown currently is in a state of having no clear direction. If it was up to you and Vince came to you asking what are 3 things they could do to help Smackdown make the turn for the better what would be your 3 ideas and why would those be your 3 ideas? The ideas can be anything from bringing in outside talent or talent from Raw, a new feud, etc. Whatever you feel will help Smackdown for the better.

Deadline:
Thursday 11:59 pm Pacific Time
 

SAL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
64
Points
48
Location
BOSTON
These are the main problems I see with the Smackdown brand right now: staleness, an overreliance on the same few established guys, no interesting feuds or angles, and (this one's just my opinion) a recent shift away from in-ring quality and toward the Raw-styled "entertainment" aspect that just doesn't work as well on the B-show. I'll freely admit that I'm not too skilled as a writer, creator, etc., so most of my ideas will be influenced by ideas that came before me. But at least those ideas worked! So here goes.

1. Alberto Del Rio. WHC. Now.

The usual formula for new guys is building them up over a long period of time and then putting the belt on them. Well, like I said, I'm borrowing ideas that worked in the past. Here I'm looking at Sheamus' build over the last year. It was a shock when he got the #1 contendership, and an even bigger shock when he won the belt. Let's do that again! ADR has huge heat already, and he's proven tremendous ability in the ring and on the microphone. The best solution is to shake things up. The main-event picture since June has been Kane-Undertaker-Edge. Been there, done that. Lots of people will suggest moving people to Smackdown, but I think there's a better answer: shifting around the people they have. We can negotiate about Ziggler, Kofi, Swagger, etc., but for me the MUST is putting Del Rio in the main event. It would give the show some much-needed freshness and direction.

2. Move the Undertaker to Raw.

I have nothing against the Dead Man. I don't love him as much as most people, but I recognize how awesome he is. But it's pretty clear that he's a part-time worker at this point in his career. And for the few months at a time he's able to work, there seems to be some pressure to put him at the top of the card. I think this is detrimental to all the aforementioned young talent, as it takes a spot away from them when he's there and puts an unfair pressure on them to match his star power when he (frequently) isn't. I'd move him to Raw in exchange for an established Raw star, like Randy Orton maybe. It doesn't matter who (except it can't be Cena obv). Smackdown will always be the Undertaker's show as long as he's there, and he just can't meet that burden anymore. Let's move him along and give him a more fitting part-time role on a star-studded Raw roster. My only regret would be that we'd lose out on Del Rio/Taker, but after the Punk/Taker angle left me cold, I don't know that we're missing much.

3. Change some heel/face dynamics.

Right now, Smackdown is really heel-based. Kane, Cody Rhodes, Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, Drew McIntyre, Dolph Ziggler, and (if he moves there, as well think he should) Wade Barrett. There are faces on the roster of course, but Kofi Kingston's the only one I see with any future. WWE needs to find a diamond in that pile of heels, someone they can build up with an eye toward turning them face and pushing them up. I'm not saying that they should turn face right now, but WWE needs to commit to them and start building their credibility and presence in the fans' minds. Maybe Swagger could pull off the goofy Kurt Angle-like face role, and he could get away with it by supplementing it with some solid, serious wrestling. I envision Alberto Del Rio as a monster heel in the near future. Cody Rhodes is a damn good heel (I hate to say it!) who is perfect for that role and that role only. They need the faces to go up against these good heels. My number 1 suggestion is Dolph Ziggler. God, I hate that name, but I think he could be a great face in the near-future. What they need to do is take the microphone out of his hands and let Vickie do ALL of the talking. Then, soon enough, he can get sick of her, break away from her, and the fans would connect with it.

It's tough to make specific roster suggestions with ever-changing rosters, but these are the 3 things I'd look to do first in order to get Smackdown through a creative lull.
 

Kairi

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
6,483
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Diva Improvement

I have always thought the purpose of having one belt was to put the best against the best. With only have one champion I would simply suggest for the belt to be defended on both shows. Especially considering the title that they kept was the divas belt anyway, the one specifically made for the women on Smackdown. If they were just going to have one title anyway, why did they split hem in the first place? One belt = one champion = best of the best on all shows.


Remove Vickie as GM

I know this seems crazy with the amount of heat that Vickie draws, but lately all she has been doing with that is helping to get Dolph over. Now do not get me wrong I love it, but I think that Vickie would fit just as good and smackdown itself would do better with a different gm, to kind of help "push" and "enforce" the new direction that it needs to go in. Could even bring in someone who would make a good face gm. If they did not want to completely remove Vickie maybe do a struggle of power type sl.


Fresh fueds

It's hard to put out new fueds, this I acknowledge, but SD needs some new fueds. If it isn't anything but bringing some nexus members over. People want to see things that are fresh and if you continue to fued the same people, do not try to branch out or throw some sweres in their directions they will stop watching. SD has seemingly went stalemate, but hopefully they can ressurect it soon.
 

SAL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
64
Points
48
Location
BOSTON
One change I would make to my own answer on second thought: I originally said to move someone like Orton to Smackdown for Undertaker. I'd rather Orton stay on Raw and someone on Raw's midcard go over, another fresh face who can compete for the right to be built into a main-eventer. I'll say Justin Gabriel, just because I like the guy, but someone like that.
 

Reid

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Age
34
Have some new blood in the main event scene. People like Del Rio and Kofi could do well in the main event. It would do wonders for their careers as they are still relativly new, as apposed to Edge who's been here for 12 or so years and Kane who's been here long than that. it would freshen up the main event scene alot. Giving Edge the WHC title was boring becuase he's had it what, 10 times now, and Kanes title reign was pretty crappy outside of a few Taker moments. Giving one of these people the title would rekindle some interest and make people want to watch Smackdown.

Another idea that can be used would be to have a long WHC title reign. Outside of Kanes recent reign which lasted for about 7 months. there has only been one other reign in the last 5 years that's lasted a real long time, that being Bastista's first reign. Instead of a long one on one feud I would get a bunch of mini feuds. This would work 2 ways. If it's a new person to the main event scene it's builds them alot of credibility. If it's a person like Edge, and it's a guy like Kofi or Del Rio who dethrone him, that seems like a huge accomplishment.

Another thing is that it would make the WHC look a lot more prestigeus.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
These are the main problems I see with the Smackdown brand right now: staleness, an overreliance on the same few established guys, no interesting feuds or angles, and (this one's just my opinion) a recent shift away from in-ring quality and toward the Raw-styled "entertainment" aspect that just doesn't work as well on the B-show. I'll freely admit that I'm not too skilled as a writer, creator, etc., so most of my ideas will be influenced by ideas that came before me. But at least those ideas worked! So here goes. (+1)

1. Alberto Del Rio. WHC. Now.

The usual formula for new guys is building them up over a long period of time and then putting the belt on them. Well, like I said, I'm borrowing ideas that worked in the past. Here I'm looking at Sheamus' build over the last year. It was a shock when he got the #1 contendership, and an even bigger shock when he won the belt. Let's do that again! ADR has huge heat already, and he's proven tremendous ability in the ring and on the microphone. The best solution is to shake things up. The main-event picture since June has been Kane-Undertaker-Edge. Been there, done that. Lots of people will suggest moving people to Smackdown, but I think there's a better answer: shifting around the people they have. We can negotiate about Ziggler, Kofi, Swagger, etc., but for me the MUST is putting Del Rio in the main event. It would give the show some much-needed freshness and direction. (+2)

2. Move the Undertaker to Raw.

I have nothing against the Dead Man. I don't love him as much as most people, but I recognize how awesome he is. But it's pretty clear that he's a part-time worker at this point in his career. And for the few months at a time he's able to work, there seems to be some pressure to put him at the top of the card. I think this is detrimental to all the aforementioned young talent, as it takes a spot away from them when he's there and puts an unfair pressure on them to match his star power when he (frequently) isn't (+2 this is a great point). I'd move him to Raw in exchange for an established Raw star, like Randy Orton maybe. It doesn't matter who (except it can't be Cena obv). Smackdown will always be the Undertaker's show as long as he's there, and he just can't meet that burden anymore (+1). Let's move him along and give him a more fitting part-time role on a star-studded Raw roster. My only regret would be that we'd lose out on Del Rio/Taker, but after the Punk/Taker angle left me cold, I don't know that we're missing much.

3. Change some heel/face dynamics.

Right now, Smackdown is really heel-based. Kane, Cody Rhodes, Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, Drew McIntyre, Dolph Ziggler, and (if he moves there, as well think he should) Wade Barrett. There are faces on the roster of course, but Kofi Kingston's the only one I see with any future. WWE needs to find a diamond in that pile of heels, someone they can build up with an eye toward turning them face and pushing them up. I'm not saying that they should turn face right now, but WWE needs to commit to them and start building their credibility and presence in the fans' minds. Maybe Swagger could pull off the goofy Kurt Angle-like face role, and he could get away with it by supplementing it with some solid, serious wrestling (+1 agreed about Swagger). I envision Alberto Del Rio as a monster heel in the near future. Cody Rhodes is a damn good heel (I hate to say it!) who is perfect for that role and that role only. They need the faces to go up against these good heels. My number 1 suggestion is Dolph Ziggler. God, I hate that name, but I think he could be a great face in the near-future. What they need to do is take the microphone out of his hands and let Vickie do ALL of the talking. Then, soon enough, he can get sick of her, break away from her, and the fans would connect with it. (+1 simple yet effective way to make Dolph face)

It's tough to make specific roster suggestions with ever-changing rosters, but these are the 3 things I'd look to do first in order to get Smackdown through a creative lull.

Diva Improvement

I have always thought the purpose of having one belt was to put the best against the best. With only have one champion I would simply suggest for the belt to be defended on both shows. Especially considering the title that they kept was the divas belt anyway, the one specifically made for the women on Smackdown. If they were just going to have one title anyway, why did they split hem in the first place? One belt = one champion = best of the best on all shows. (+1)


Remove Vickie as GM

I know this seems crazy with the amount of heat that Vickie draws, but lately all she has been doing with that is helping to get Dolph over. Now do not get me wrong I love it, but I think that Vickie would fit just as good and smackdown itself would do better with a different gm, to kind of help "push" and "enforce" the new direction that it needs to go in. Could even bring in someone who would make a good face gm. If they did not want to completely remove Vickie maybe do a struggle of power type sl. (Teddy is actually the GM and Vickie is just the consultant)


Fresh fueds

It's hard to put out new fueds, this I acknowledge, but SD needs some new fueds. If it isn't anything but bringing some nexus members over. People want to see things that are fresh and if you continue to fued the same people, do not try to branch out or throw some sweres in their directions they will stop watching. SD has seemingly went stalemate, but hopefully they can ressurect it soon. (+1)


Have some new blood in the main event scene. People like Del Rio and Kofi could do well in the main event. It would do wonders for their careers as they are still relativly new, as apposed to Edge who's been here for 12 or so years and Kane who's been here long than that. it would freshen up the main event scene alot. Giving Edge the WHC title was boring becuase he's had it what, 10 times now, and Kanes title reign was pretty crappy outside of a few Taker moments. Giving one of these people the title would rekindle some interest and make people want to watch Smackdown. (+1)

Another idea that can be used would be to have a long WHC title reign. Outside of Kanes recent reign which lasted for about 7 months. there has only been one other reign in the last 5 years that's lasted a real long time, that being Bastista's first reign. Instead of a long one on one feud I would get a bunch of mini feuds. This would work 2 ways. If it's a new person to the main event scene it's builds them alot of credibility. If it's a person like Edge, and it's a guy like Kofi or Del Rio who dethrone him, that seems like a huge accomplishment. (+2)

Another thing is that it would make the WHC look a lot more prestigeus.
1. RONDO: 13
2. Kairi: 6
3. Reid: 8
4. Baller: 5
-------
At the end of the 2nd round Baller is the one with the lowest score so we say bye to him as we move on to the 3rd round.

Topic #3:
Whether it's WWE, ROH, TNA, etc, in whatever company you want what would you bring back to that respective company that they used to have and why? Whether it be a wrestler, a writer, a ppv, whatever. Now if your stance is that nothing needs to be brought back then please explain why you feel that way.

Deadline:
Saturday 11:59 pm Pacific Time

 

SAL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
64
Points
48
Location
BOSTON
I'm usually not big on making specific changes. It's really hard to say something like "Man, if WWE just had ______, they'd make even more billions of dollars. If TNA had _______, they might have a coherent show." Furthermore, I don't see how adding any one wrestler or any one gimmick to a company can make that big of a difference. The one part of the question that really struck me was about bringing back a writer. Ah, yes. One person that can have an influence on many, who can shape the direction of an entire show.

I would bring Paul Heyman back and give him the keys to Smackdown.

I'll keep this short for now. Paul Heyman is widely considered one of the greatest creative minds in the history of wrestling. He spawned the ECW hardcore revolution which led to WWE's "attitude era" which kept them afloat. But let's go beyond the fact that he was behind hardcore, because that obviously wouldn't fly in today's WWE. What Paul Heyman specialized in was creating characters that people cared about, and giving wrestlers the chance to make themselves look good. We all wrote plenty of words about what could be done to improve Smackdown. I really think the pieces are there, and the show just needs some creative direction to maximize the star-making potential of many of those pieces. What would help accomplish that? Interesting storylines and gimmicks. Heyman helped write for Smackdown in 2002, with a lot of great in-ring talent he helped push up where they belonged. I'm talking about Edge, Mysterio, and Benoit specifically. He helped plant the seeds to get them to the next level with the fans. I see a similar situation here. Heyman should be brought in and given enough control to send Smackdown in a new direction.
 

Reid

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
265
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Age
34
I'm going to mirror what Rondo said in that Heyman would be a good addition to the WWE staff. I don't know if he could be a on air talent because of him being a Lesnar's agent, but him as a writer would be great. He's got a proven track track record of success at the writing level and as long as you keep him away from the business aspect of the WWE then you'd be a-ok. And since Vince is the greatest business mind in wrestling history that's no problem.

If you can get him on the air on Smackdown or Raw you could do improve a guys stock by having him manage them.

Another guy I would love to see back in a WWE ring is Eric Bischoff. The mystery gm thing ran it's course in September and it hasn't evolved past Michael Cole announcing the gm's statements. If it was leading to some sort of storyline i'd think they would have finished it by now.

He was a great gm during his stint in the WWE, I feel like Raw or Smackdown could use him to spice things up again. Raw doesn't really have a gm and i'm tired of Teddy Long, while Vickie is great at getting heat, she's been Ziggler's manager for the last few months. He'd be a improvement over both of the current GMs
 

Kairi

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
6,483
Reaction score
2
Points
38
Heyman and Bischoff are great choices if you just want to zoom in on bringing one person. They have both done great things during respective times. My only problem with focusing on one person is while their ideas may appear great on paper, it actually has to pass through a lot of people, who might end up knit picking over it, thus having a great idea, turn into a watered down idea and by the time it comes across to people on - screen, it's utter and pure crap.
 
With that being said it's not to say Heyman or Bischoff are crap, just when you put the whole thing in one person's hands, their vision might not come across, because of others wanting to tweak their ideas.
 
anyway this is something so small but i would bring the six sided ring back to tna.

i know a ring is a ring, but the six sided ring, and the athletes ability to actually make complete use of the ring was one of the best things about tna to me. don't get me wrong they can work a four sided ring just as well, but did they honestly have to change it when what they had was working for them.