Money in the Bank They should of kept the money in the bank match at Wrestlemania?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Where should the match be?

  • keep 1 briefcase so more rivalry (Wrestlemania)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • normal ppv and 2 briefcases

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,031
Reaction score
712
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
MitB match at wrestlemania?

:yes::yes::yes::yes::yes::yes:
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Depends. Considering the way they book midcarders normally, MITB is easier because although it's that match that fills time and puts lots of guys who wouldn't be on the show on the show, you're interested in the winner. But if they could book interesting midcard feuds then no, I think it'd be OK not to have MITB as the matches wouldn't be pure filler (Johnny vs Teddy was a good feud for midcard standards though). But I don't really mind, we either get it at WM or MITB, but we get it anyway.
 

Jose Tortilla

Champion
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
778
Points
0
Age
30
One MITB match at Wrestlemania.

They are awesome, full of impact and puts mid-carders over as hell. Also, as said earlier: It's a great filler and it never gets boring for me.. (If you let out Big Show)
 

Jose Tortilla

Champion
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
778
Points
0
Age
30
:shock:

MITB PPV AAAAND a match at WM!

UmpOi.gif
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
I like having it as it's own PPV. But the one advantage to it being at Wrestlemania, as mentioned, is that a lot of guys who might not be on the show otherwise can get thrown into the MITB match and collect a WM paycheck that way. But still, what if you want a ladder match at WM because it's the natural progression of a feud that is happening? I don't like having two ladder matches at WM.
 

Zach

Emma Watson ♥ ♥ ♥
Joined
Dec 21, 2011
Messages
4,174
Reaction score
435
Points
0
Age
29
MiTB is probably my favorite PPV aside from Royal Rumble. Like someone said above, it puts midcards over, and gives the opportunity for some great story lines without really having a reason to. They can just throw the MiTB winner into a feud because you know why? He's the god damn briefcase holder, thats why. I love it.
 

Matt

Champion
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
17,129
Reaction score
606
Points
0
Age
17
I dont really have an opinion on this. having it at WM or it's own PPV would be fine for me
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
Pretty torn here. Yeah, having one match will make it feel special, but the opportunity to make 2 stars instead of 1 is great

(Then again, look at the last 3 years, pretending Jack Swagger doesn't exist: 2010 Kane didn't need it but Miz was elevated, 2011 D-Bry got the push while it was wasted on ADR, this year Cena winning was Blue as Ziggler has a chance to become a star... May as well only have 1)

It should definitely be at Mania. Having the PPV is nice but Mania really doesn't feel right without it.
 

Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,031
Reaction score
712
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
2 briefcases are stupid

one briefcase wm match

so much better