Who do you think is the WORST wrestler ever in WWE. I mean so bad that you can't even imagine how the fuck they got the 15minutes of fame that they did?
For me it'd have to be Giant Gonzales.
For me it'd have to be Giant Gonzales.
The VERY Worst EVER!!!
- Thread starter UndertakerTheGreat
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
chessarmy
Guest
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,685
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
- Location
- St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
Batista and Lashley, lol. I can't think of any really, I always did wonder how Santino got called up with his wrestling skills, but I'm glad he did.
CenaMark54
Guest
I'm not sure I would put Batista, Lashley, or Santino in the catagory of the worst wrestlers of all time.
There were a lot of really bad wrestlers in the 80's and early 90's. Zeus, Giant Gonzales.
Soulpower
Guest
Gotta go with Giant Gonzalez. The dude makes Khali look good in comparison.
Honorable mentions go to Ron and Don Harris.
Honorable mentions go to Ron and Don Harris.
MikeRaw
Guest
Chuck Taylor's Grenade
Guest
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,685
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
- Location
- St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
Batista and Lashley were jokes. Santino at callup was pretty much the closest I could think of but as I said I really couldn't think of anyone that fit EXACTLY! Although now, Great Khali. Seriously.
What makes him the worst? The fact that he did exactly what he was paid to do, which was be a monster heel that could get the fans to hate him?
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,685
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
- Location
- St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
I think it was the booking that got his heat. He's way to slow and boring. You want to see how a big guy should be, look at Big Show.
You're not going to get an argument out of me about how much Khali can do. The man is about as limited as they get. Hell, he can hardly walk, let alone wrestler. But the fact is, he did what he was paid to do, and that was be a believable monster heel that could draw heat. You can give booking the credit for it, but that's pretty much just coming from your personal bias against him. Obviously booking helps, there is no denying that. However, had they booked Jamie Noble the exact same way they booked Khali, people wouldn't give two shits about him, and would just think it's a complete joke. Nobody would believe that Noble could get a clean win over the Undertaker like Khali did. Like it or not, Khali is a believable monster heel that has been able to get a reaction from the crowd. That's why I don't see how he can really be in the discussion for the worst ever.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2007
- Messages
- 1,685
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
- Location
- St. Bernard/Cincinnati, Ohio
Yeah, but the only thing that made Khali fit his gimmick WAS his size. Of course Jamie Noble can't do that gimmick. Khali's skill/work rate/charisma did nothing for this. The only thing that helped him was his look and Giant Gonzalez had that too.
Wordlife
Guest
Travis40
Guest