The Rock In Next Year's Rumble Match

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
If availability isn't an issue, does anyone think it would be awesome for The Rock to enter next year's Royal Rumble match?

We all know that no matter what his schedule is, Rock will be at Wrestlemania XXX. WWE will throw whatever money they can to acquire him for their 30th anniversary WM and Rock is already known as "the hardest working man in Hollywood" so he'll somehow find a way to make it work.

Firstly, he can return to Raw during the build to Wrestlemania and say that last year he promised to win the WWE Championship once more at the 2013 Rumble, and he made good on that promise. One year later, he now vows to win the Royal Rumble match itself one more time and then go on to reclaim the WWE Championship in the main event of Wrestlemania or maybe even the World Heavyweight Championship (would be nice for him to tease going after the Big Gold Belt, although he technically already buried that title as being second rate to him when he ignored mentioning it the night after Wrestlemania 28 when he said he wanted to be world champion again.)

Secondly, it would be a good way to build towards an angle with someone for Wrestlemania. Since Rock/Lesnar is practically set in stone for WM30 should Rock choose to wrestle again, I'll use that as an example. Say that after Rock announces his entry into the Rumble, there is a spontaneous confrontation between Rock and Paul Heyman at some point. I don't know what would instigate this face off, maybe just Heyman interrupting and spouting his mouth off for no reason, but if it ends with The Rock giving Heyman the Rock Bottom, then the seeds have already been planted for Rock/Brock since Lesnar has always acted as a huge protector of Heyman. (His feud with Punk is centered around Heyman and his two rematches with HHH began with Vince attempting to fire Heyman.)

The way to further the build to Wrestlemania is to have Lesnar then cost Rock the Rumble match. The Rock comes in and starts cleaning house by tossing a couple of people over the top rope, punching and stomping and hitting the Rock Bottom on a few people and even giving someone the delicacy of being hit with the People's Elbow. Perhaps he comes in late so he can make it to the final four without being out there too long. Then, in runs Lesnar all of a sudden and he hits an F-5 on Rock, which allows someone else to toss Rock over the top much to the surprise of everyone. (It'd be just like Goldberg exactly ten years before.) This sets up the Rock/Lesnar feud well, which makes sense since they'd probably want to promote a big match like this as much in advance as possible. It also allows someone, a heel obviously, the bragging rights of saying they eliminated The Rock from the Rumble. It'd also be fitting if one of the people Rock tossed out was Curtis Axel given the Heyman involvement here, though perhaps you could argue it'd be fitting if Axel tossed out Rock instead (though Rock wouldn't be making it to the final four in that case, cause no way is Axel gonna still be there that close to the end of the match.)

Lastly, Rock's involvement in the Rumble match would add extra buys to the PPV on top of making the Rumble match a bit more special by knowing The Rock could come in at any moment.
 

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
not unless they let him win, or screw him over for a wm feud. Dude is past it, and his last deal was horrible, honestly.

Id rather they bring rock back for next years summerslam, at least that would have a shorter build/better take. I honestly want part timer vs part timer though, no reason to screw over another match for someone who wont be there for more than 2 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: akapablo_

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Honestly I'm pretty happy Rock isn't around, I'll just hold on to the small hopes I have of him not coming back. But I really don't want to see Rock/Lesnar.
 

Dat Kid1

King of smurf Style
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
22,647
Reaction score
5,892
Points
0
Location
New York, NY
Website
youtube.com
I would not be surprised if it's Rock/Cena 3 and now before everyone crucifies me, here's why I think it'll be that match again. 30th Anniversary and Cena and Rock just coincidentally happen to be one and one with each other at Mania. I doubt, no I HIGHLY doubt that they will let one of the most hyped rivalries of all time go unsolved on who can really beat who, there needs to be a clear winner between the two and Wrestlemania is the only place I see that match happening.

Lesnar vs Rock is a nice thing to do, but is it more of a main event than Cena vs Rock? On top of that both of those guys are part timers, which would make it extremely difficult to sell that rivalry when neither of them show up.

Now to the topic. Rock winning Royal Rumble imo would be overkill, just like Cena winning the Rumble was overkill. I would much rather see a #1 Contender's Match between Rock & Lesnar. That way we get the match we all want and some young deserving talent can get over by winning the Royal Rumble and go for the WHC.
 

Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
Would rather Rock not be at WM 30 if he is i want SCSA to come back and deliver one last stunner to The Rock screwing him over.

As for the RR wouldnt surprise me as the guest entrants have seemed a bit thin on the ground and lame last couple of years.
 

Brad.

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
2,146
Reaction score
502
Points
0
Don't get why people want part-timer v part-timer. WWE should use guys like Rock, Lesnar etc to put over younger guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leo C

Brother Loathe

Ah Loathe Yewwwwww
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
2,355
Reaction score
291
Points
0
Location
A Bad Place
I'm in the middle with this, I don't really want to see The Rock return and come back for a title or do anything and then just leave abruptly. But on the other hand, he might have a feud with Lesnar or Taker which would be cool to see which of them wins. Or he might not even come back. Either way, I don't care too much.
 

Wacokid27

The Dark Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
11,540
Reaction score
2,235
Points
0
Location
The Rock Ridge Jail
I'm just as happy to not have the Rock back in a match. He can be like Stone Cold and come back here-and-there, just to come in and Rock Bottom somebody, then disappear again for 3 - 12 months.

I'm still not happy with the decision to have him go over a full time main eventer (especially one who's been built as a legitimate champ and had just carried the title for the longest period in over a quarter of a century...the fans were robbed of what should have been the victory of John Cena over CM Punk for the WWE Championship), just to drop the title back to Cena two months later. I don't hink it was a well-built or well-executed match, and both the build and execution were lacking on Rock's part, not Cena's, who improved leaps and bounds between WM 28 and WM 29. The only problem with his part in the match/feud/build was that he just didn't look excited to wrestle the Rock like he had the year before.

So, to recap: no Rock in the Rumble, no Rock-Lesnar, no Rock-Cena 3. Putting the Rock in the ring doesn't build anybody, not even when he puts somebody over.

wk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leo C

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
I'm just as happy to not have the Rock back in a match. He can be like Stone Cold and come back here-and-there, just to come in and Rock Bottom somebody, then disappear again for 3 - 12 months.

I'm still not happy with the decision to have him go over a full time main eventer (especially one who's been built as a legitimate champ and had just carried the title for the longest period in over a quarter of a century...the fans were robbed of what should have been the victory of John Cena over CM Punk for the WWE Championship), just to drop the title back to Cena two months later. I don't hink it was a well-built or well-executed match, and both the build and execution were lacking on Rock's part, not Cena's, who improved leaps and bounds between WM 28 and WM 29. The only problem with his part in the match/feud/build was that he just didn't look excited to wrestle the Rock like he had the year before.

So, to recap: no Rock in the Rumble, no Rock-Lesnar, no Rock-Cena 3. Putting the Rock in the ring doesn't build anybody, not even when he puts somebody over.

wk

I've missed you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wacokid27

Super Saiyan Goku

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
12,001
Reaction score
842
Points
0
Age
33
I only wanted him to wrestler against The Undertaker. Brock would fuckin injury him and holywood already bitch at him for getting injury to cena. Undertaker would not try hurt him like brock would do he fuckin fighter. Undertaker more of professal! I WISH PEOPLE WOULD FUCKIN UNDERSTAND THIS!
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
I would not be surprised if it's Rock/Cena 3 and now before everyone crucifies me, here's why I think it'll be that match again. 30th Anniversary and Cena and Rock just coincidentally happen to be one and one with each other at Mania. I doubt, no I HIGHLY doubt that they will let one of the most hyped rivalries of all time go unsolved on who can really beat who, there needs to be a clear winner between the two and Wrestlemania is the only place I see that match happening.

Lesnar vs Rock is a nice thing to do, but is it more of a main event than Cena vs Rock? On top of that both of those guys are part timers, which would make it extremely difficult to sell that rivalry when neither of them show up.

Now to the topic. Rock winning Royal Rumble imo would be overkill, just like Cena winning the Rumble was overkill. I would much rather see a #1 Contender's Match between Rock & Lesnar. That way we get the match we all want and some young deserving talent can get over by winning the Royal Rumble and go for the WHC.


I'm absolutely convinced that Rock/Lesnar would be bigger than a third Cena/Rock match and probably even the second one. Cena/Rock and HHH/Brock rematches on the same card (the latter did very well buy rate wise for Summerslam) didn't even do the 1.3 million buy rate that WWE hoped it would this year, so I'm feeling they'll go a different route for the big 30th anniversary of the event in regards to who Cena and The Rock wrestle. I don't care for Rock/Lesnar either but I'm being objective, it's been rumored and it's an obvious cash cow for a Wrestlemania, not to mention WWE has already foreshadowed it with Lesnar staring down the Rumble poster with The Rock's picture on it when he and Heyman paid a visit to WWE Headquarters. I know it's hard to believe that WWE won't have the rubber match for the feud but Cena defeating The Rock once already proves he can defeat him again in any other rematch. There's really nothing left to prove for Cena as far as going against The Great One.
 

Nano

The Game
Technician
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
540
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Website
www.pheed.com
I think WWE will give him another title reign... I don't really like the idea of giving a part timer the most prestigous belt in he company, but it's The ROCK! It's an international star! But at least in my opinion it's just boring to watch Rocky as the WWE champ...