The Orlando Sentinal Ranks the Wrestlemanias

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Soulpower

Guest
I hate these type of lists. They basically go for the shows with the best moment instead of going with the shows that were actually, you know.... good.
 

John

Guest
Wrestlemania 3 the best WM ever??? i dont think so. yet again the shows with the most memorable moment like slamming the giant overshadows the incredibly boring other 3 hours but wrestlemania 16 gets like 10 when it was quite an acceptable show.
 

CenaMark54

Guest
I would have put Wrestlemania 2000 near the end of that list.

I would have moved 3 down a few slots. Like SP said, it has the most momorable moment, but nowhere near the best card.

I would have put Mania 21 at the top of the list because it was an all around great card (People will say I'm biased but.......)

.....I would move 22 way down the list. They totally fucked up the SD main event by making it a triple threat. The only match that was remotely Mania worthy was Edge vs Foley. Cena vs HHH could have been a lot better.
 

Johnny Demon

New Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
33
Wrestlemania 19 should be in the top 5 and wrestlemania 23 should be in the top 10.
 

OsamaHussian

Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
32
Location
N/A
Am I the only one that thinks Wrestlemania 18 is highly over-rated? The card was complete garbage. The only thing that I cared about was Rock-Hogan and honestly that match sucked too, the crowd reaction is what made it special.
 

xtremebadass

Guest
Believe it or not, that is pretty accurate. WM3 maybe not the biggest, but 2-4 is dead on. WM22 should be way down there while XIX should have been 5. What dumbass put 2000 that high?
 

TheAnswer

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
557
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
43
WrestleMania 23 should have been in the bottom 5. That WM had two good matches, the rest were really bad.
 

xtremebadass

Guest
Yea I agree WM23 sucked horribly, it was too much centered around Battle fo the Billionaires, with 2, might I say, noobs...wrestlers that you don't give a shit about. HBK vs. Cena could have been way better, I didn't like it, their match on Raw put it to shame. Taker and Batista was the only good thing about it.
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
43
WM 23 had a lot of good matches. Cena/HBK was great, MITB was great, Batista/Taker was great and the Battle of the Billionares was pretty good too. Fucking WMs 4 and 8 should NOT be that low and 21 should NOT be that high. There were two, maybe 3 good matches at 21 and NONE OF THEM were the main events. I seriously almost fell asleep during Cena/JBL and Batista/HHH
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
Man seriouslesly, what did that guy have against WM XIX. That was my favourite of all time
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
43
Because it was Angle/Brock and Y2J/HBK along with 3 hours of filler
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
The triple threat tag team was enjoyable, the opener between matt and rey was pretty good, undertaker match was meh, rock austin was decent, booker hhh was pretty good and hogan vs mcmahon was entertaining. Yet that's three hours of filler?
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
43
Oh yah, McMahon Hogan, I forgot about that. But that Rock/Austin match was FAR from their best.
 

THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps

Guest
^^I know it was far from their best, but it was entertaining nonehteless. All around I felt the card delivered pretty dman well