- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 39,124
- Reaction score
- 5,642
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 30
- Location
- God's Country, Sheffield UK
Now whenever these threads are usually made Russo or Arquette usually win and rightly so, however these were won in companies where wrestling played second fiddle to entertainment so they made some contored sense. Now the one reign which always bugged me was when James Gibson (Jamie Noble) was the one who toppled CM Punk and saved the compaines Honor in a fourway elimination match, which also featured Christopher Daniels and Samoa Joe. This isn't even about Noble in all honesty, he was built pretty well and was good enough in ring to have a short reign before passing it on to some vanilla midget called Bryan Danielson. The issue is you had Daniels return, one of the founding fathers of the company who was mocked by Punk for his decision to run off to TNA with AJ Styles post the Rob Feinstein incident. It was a perfect oppourtunity for a babyface Daniels to hold the strap after ending the threats Punk held to take it with him.
Now avoiding the obvious choices from WWE and WCW, which title reigns did you find most questionable?
Now avoiding the obvious choices from WWE and WCW, which title reigns did you find most questionable?