phantomgerald
Guest
Why smackdown doesn't interest me anymore
i personally no longer feel like watching smackdown for the time being. i feel that the feuds are just not as interesting as compared to the NB/original feud.
MVP vs benoit: though they always put on good matches, i don't think there is much build-up to this feud. MVP just screws benoit to piss benoit off, then cheat to win a title shot. this feud just seems pointless to me. if MVP was better, he would have won the title by now. i hate title feuds that stretch too long.
Deuce & Domino(D&D) vs London & Kendrick(L&K): i don't like this feud mainly because i don't think D&D deserve this title so fast and i think that if they were to beat L&K, it shouldn't be in the first match as it makes L&K look bad. also, where is the London-Kendrick feud that have been rumored for so long. if they were to split and go into singles competition, i think they should have a long feud with each other first. also i don't think they will get far in singles competition because of their size.
Kane (sometimes with boogeyman) vs Regal & Taylor: somebody please explain to me this feud. why does regal & taylor hate kane? because he's big and a monster? then how about you two englishman go attack the great khali then? this is just a stupid feud.
Batista vs Undertaker: ok this feud have been good so far with batista raising his game to put on a good show, but then undertaker have to get injured. if batista become the new champion, who does he feud with? since about may last year, the three challengers to batista's title have been kennedy, booker and undertaker. booker is injured, and Kennedy is Mr money in the bank so he wouldn't feud with the champion so quickly, and undertaker is injured. who challenges Batista? from the current roster, nobody there are nobody that deserves it that is not in a feud. so unless wwe trade someone from raw over, we will be seeing batista squashing mid-carders. and please don't say mark henry, that's almost as bad as cena-khali.
i personally no longer feel like watching smackdown for the time being. i feel that the feuds are just not as interesting as compared to the NB/original feud.
MVP vs benoit: though they always put on good matches, i don't think there is much build-up to this feud. MVP just screws benoit to piss benoit off, then cheat to win a title shot. this feud just seems pointless to me. if MVP was better, he would have won the title by now. i hate title feuds that stretch too long.
Deuce & Domino(D&D) vs London & Kendrick(L&K): i don't like this feud mainly because i don't think D&D deserve this title so fast and i think that if they were to beat L&K, it shouldn't be in the first match as it makes L&K look bad. also, where is the London-Kendrick feud that have been rumored for so long. if they were to split and go into singles competition, i think they should have a long feud with each other first. also i don't think they will get far in singles competition because of their size.
Kane (sometimes with boogeyman) vs Regal & Taylor: somebody please explain to me this feud. why does regal & taylor hate kane? because he's big and a monster? then how about you two englishman go attack the great khali then? this is just a stupid feud.
Batista vs Undertaker: ok this feud have been good so far with batista raising his game to put on a good show, but then undertaker have to get injured. if batista become the new champion, who does he feud with? since about may last year, the three challengers to batista's title have been kennedy, booker and undertaker. booker is injured, and Kennedy is Mr money in the bank so he wouldn't feud with the champion so quickly, and undertaker is injured. who challenges Batista? from the current roster, nobody there are nobody that deserves it that is not in a feud. so unless wwe trade someone from raw over, we will be seeing batista squashing mid-carders. and please don't say mark henry, that's almost as bad as cena-khali.