JoeRulz said:
Why are people mad because Sting went over Roode in a non-title match?
The main gripe I had was that it set up him being the #1 Contender:
-We've seen the match before, and it sucked. Other than "LOLTNA" logic, there's no reason to believe Sting will win. Plus he always gets protected way too often (but so does Bob Van Dam, so we'll see)
-Sting's not that big of a draw, he hasn't been relevant in 10 years and the ratings don't go up that much with him as champion, and after that they certainly don't sustain them. His nostalgia act wore off pretty quickly.
-A bigger percentage of hardcore/IWC type fans watch TNA than WWE, and there's no way in hell they are buying the PPV for that match. Newer, casual fans just see a guy who gets winded easily and has a downright pathetic moveset.
-Like Stopspot just said, it looked like James Storm could get a rematch against Roode, or Austin Aries could get his main-event push, or maybe a more-relevant star like Jeff Hardy or Mr. Anderson could get a title shot. Don't see why you would pick Sting over them.
-This is Slammiversary, the culmination of a ten-year journey for TNA. We expected big things from this PPV, but this is really lackluster.
Epic sig btw