- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 33
Is that the common line of thinking? Reigns/Rollins win the tag titles and Ambrose takes down Kofi?
It is the only thing that makes sense on the surface, but is that the most interesting way WWE could take it? Personally I think it would be better if Hell No overcomes Reigns & Rollins and WWE can build up the fact that they are unstoppable as a trio, but they become mortal when you divide and conquer. After Hell No retains, you can have Reigns/Rollins come down to try and help Amrbose win the belt but instead cost him the match with botched interference.
They don't lose any of the luster they have as a trio, and if anything it would strengthen their gang mentality. They can also regain any momentum losing the title matches might lose them by getting involved in one of the two main events.
Just some thoughts. I'm honestly the one person who seems bored with the status quo of the Shield atm, so I think I am just hoping for something a little different from their angle.
It is the only thing that makes sense on the surface, but is that the most interesting way WWE could take it? Personally I think it would be better if Hell No overcomes Reigns & Rollins and WWE can build up the fact that they are unstoppable as a trio, but they become mortal when you divide and conquer. After Hell No retains, you can have Reigns/Rollins come down to try and help Amrbose win the belt but instead cost him the match with botched interference.
They don't lose any of the luster they have as a trio, and if anything it would strengthen their gang mentality. They can also regain any momentum losing the title matches might lose them by getting involved in one of the two main events.
Just some thoughts. I'm honestly the one person who seems bored with the status quo of the Shield atm, so I think I am just hoping for something a little different from their angle.