Rematch clauses

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Pop Tatari

Christian vieri
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
4,092
Reaction score
2,137
Points
113
Location
London, United Kingdom
What are every ones opinion on this? I really hate this if you lose the title you should get back to the end of the line.

I want to see fresh feuds and i feel this just stops that, look at Christian vs Orton and Show vs Del rio. cunts
 
Last edited:

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
I am okay with them if they get them out of the way early. If you drag a rematch clause out for a long time there better be a good feud lined up to justify it. It seems somewhat logical that the former champ gets a shot at the new one but I also see your point.
 

Roi

Champion
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
9,978
Reaction score
1,768
Points
0
Age
28
Location
Spain
I actually hate the rematch clauses cuz you know that the guy is not tacking the belt back
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
I hate rematch clauses. It sort of leads to a pseudo burial of the champ after he drops the belt, which really can stunt the growth of the mid card when you have a guys having to re-job to a mid carder when they are ready to move up to the main event scene.