There just aren't enough talented guys to have three separate brands. In addition, having all the top guys commingled would allow for more creativity and additional fueds so we don't have to see Cena/HHH/Orton and Edge/Taker for the next 5 years.
There aren't enough talented guys? WWE's roster is full of talented guys. It's how Vince uses them, it's how creative decides on what they do, it's the way they (the wrestlers) put on a show in the ring. I'd maybe even say they have more talented than not talented guys on their roster.
On the subject of a title unification, with both the titles on RAW, it could lead to a title uni. match. Not right away but some months down the line.
Keeping both titles on Raw would stronly devalue one. Then it's like, anyone who doesn't win one, could be booked to go win the other one. For example, if Batista lost to Triple H, he could randomly go and challenge Cena.
That doesn't make any since. They are 2 different titles. Yes, there's a possibility of one of the titles being devalued, I'm not talking about that statement. I'm talking about the next one. That's like somebody losing the the World title, jumping right to the tag title title, losing that one and then jumping right to the IC title, losing that, then jumping right to oh lets say the MitB case..... Wait CM Punk just did all of that didn't he? Yet nobody (but me) seems to say anything about that.
Not to mention, what would Taker, Edge, Jericho, Rey, Umaga, Punk, etc, fight for on SD? I understand YOU dont' classify Rey, Kane, Jeff and Punk as main eventers, but that's an ignorant statement. All those guys are considered main eventers, and reightfull so, as they've all held world titles. Saying they can only fight for mid card titles is an insult.
Hey, it's an interesting idea, but I think there's too many downsides. The only way this happens is if they're gonna do a unified championship thing, where they leave both titles on Raw, and eventually unify them.
Are you serious? That's an ignorant statement? Just because you won a world title doesn't mean you're a life time main eventer. Let's go with the guys you named, Rey hasn't held a world title since what 04 (which was a crap reign)? He's had world title shots yes, but he's not a main eventer. He jumps from upper mid card to main eventer form time to time, but he's more upper mid card. Kane held a world title for a day. That was like 8 years ago. Since then he's had minimum main event feuds/matches. He's gone from jobber to mid card for years until his ECW title reign. But after he lost that he's gone right back to jobber/mid card. Jeff just recently got out of a world title reign (which sucked too). His title reign didn't even seem like it was around him and the title, that was all over shadowed with the whole mysterious attacker thing. He was a main eventer before he won the title though. But he's now back in the upper mid card. Punk held the World almost a year ago (his reign sucked too). He's title hopped immediatly to every title ever since then. As I stated above, World, Tag, IC, MitB, and pretty sure right back to world title again. Did you notice anything about those 4 guys you named? They all had only one reign (with the exception of Kane) and all their reigns sucked. They looked weak, and for the most part, jobbed through-out their reign. They all (right after their reign) dropped back down to Mid carding/upper midcarding.
Just because you win a world title doesn't make you a main eventer. The matches you put on, the feuds you have, the intensity, the height-ness of it, that's what makes you a main eventer. If you do that your entire career, then you're a life long main eventer, not just because you held the title for a day. With that logic, Morrison, Mark Henry, Great Khali, Vince McMahon, and Chavo ( they all held the ECW title) for example are main eventers.
Not to mention, what would Taker, Edge, Jericho, Rey, Umaga, Punk, etc, fight for on SD? Saying they can only fight for mid card titles is an insult.
What are these guys fighting for now? Edge is fighting for a world title but what about everyone else? What are they doing now? How about they fight for the same titles they've been fighting for for most of their career.? Rey, Umaga, Punk, they've all been going for mid card titles for at least 12 months. With Taker, Edge, and Jericho, who says you need a title to make you good, or have a great feud? Who says that once you win a world title, you can't go back to fighting for a mid card title? What better way to REALLY bring prestiege back to the US and IC titles, than having guys like that put on the same type of matches they would for the world title. Regal said he'd bring prestiege back and he lost his 1st (real) title defense). Punk just fought JBL every week in repeat matches. JBL said he'd bring prestiege to the title and lost his 1st defense in 20 something seconds. Rey won the title, was left off tv for a whole week I believe, and he's now jobbing to Big Show. People say they want presteige brought to the titles and this would be their chance to really do it. This would be the chance WWE really shows that they care about these belt like once before.
EDIT: Or if that doesn't work, they could always attack the GM's at a ppv, and insert their self in a World title match. Edge has done it before, he can do it again. Anyone else can do it as well.
