Ratings are in

[Dolph'sZiggler]

http://www.cagesideseats.com/2012/6/5/3066505/wwe-raw-ratings-for-june-4-panic-show-average-4-28-million-viewers

2.92

What was it last week? I can't remember. This isn't a big improvement though

 

[Leo C]

Last week was a 2.7. Not a big improvement. I'm normally more interested in the break downs though.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I know the 2nd hour lost viewers. I'm assuming the ME probably saw a huge drop off, but who knows

 

[Farooq]

Wow, well they got more then last week so congratulations I guess >_> and I had forgotten all about HHH taking over Vince's spot...I'm sure they'll say it's because of HHH injury or something like that for Vince's return reason.

 

[Big Hoss Rambler]

Damn I thought it was gonna go down even more. Went up by 0.2.

 

[Leo C]

The ME should be a drop, if there's still something right in this world. Why would I want to see Cole get beat up by Cena and getting BBQ sauce poured over him? Horrible. Damn comedy wrestling.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Comedy wrestling is funny. That was something far far worse last night.

 

[Leo C]

Putting overly comedic wrestling involving Cena on the main event of your flagship show for no reason is a bad thing, that's what I meant. Last night was... :facepalm1:

 

[Big Hoss Rambler]

A 2.92 rating and an average of 4.28 million viewers. The first hour averaged 4.32 million viewers while the second averaged 4.25, so there's that nasty second hour decline again.

Second hour lost 70k people. Should've been more.

 

[Farooq]

No this is what that match was

 

[Crayo]

2.9 is still a real bad rating for WWE.

 

[Donald Trump_]

2.9 is still a real bad rating for WWE.

better than 2.7. :

 

[Big Hoss Rambler]

better than 2.7. :

And has average RAW viewers.

 

[Crayo]

better than 2.7. :

And worse than their usual 3.2+'s

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

That Booker face is so assy. It needs a better cut out or to just be scraped