Rate WWE Slammy Awards 2014

[Roadster]

Vote above and give your thoughts below.

 

[Roadster]

It was an average RAW. Had a little inside mark out moment for Charlotte and Tyson Kidd was pretty funny in that segment as well. The awards were pretty predictable if you ask me. Nothing stood out of this episode, except the fact that J&J with Seth Rollins is the best thing going in WWE's main event scene, imo.

 

[Jacob Fox]

I was going back and forth between a 6 and 7. Decided on six.

The good things:

Slammy Awards was dorky but worked all right as filler which kept the show from dragging.

Ambrose and Wyatt promo was excellent... still can't believe they are pushing Reigns instead of Ambrose.

Harper vs Rowan was pretty interesting before it ended.

Mizdow was exceptional in his stunt double role.

Charlotte debuting was great.

Negative:

Interesting matches were cut short : Natalya v Charlotte and Harper v Rowan.

Why the hell do the fans think Roman Reigns deserved the superstar slammy over Lesnar or Daniel Bryan.

Nothing really memorable.

Cena vs Show for the 1000th time.

The reason I gave it an average rating, though, is that I didn't almost fall asleep during it like I did during the last few Raws, so that is something.

 

[Roadster]

I was going back and forth between a 6 and 7. Decided on six.

The good things:

Slammy Awards was dorky but worked all right as filler which kept the show from dragging.

Ambrose and Wyatt promo was excellent... still can't believe they are pushing Reigns instead of Ambrose.

Harper vs Rowan was pretty interesting before it ended.

Mizdow was exceptional in his stunt double role.

Charlotte debuting was great.

Negative:

Interesting matches were cut short : Natalya v Charlotte and Harper v Rowan.

Why the hell do the fans think Roman Reigns deserved the superstar slammy over Lesnar or Daniel Bryan.

Nothing really memorable.

Cena vs Show for the 1000th time.

The reason I gave it an average rating, though, is that I didn't almost fall asleep during it like I did during the last few Raws, so that is something.

Well, Brock Lesnar had 3 matches (Sure they were bigger than all of Reigns' matches combined) and Daniel Bryan hasn't been here since like May...

 

[Jacob Fox]

Well, Brock Lesnar had 3 matches (Sure they were bigger than all of Reigns' matches combined) and Daniel Bryan hasn't been here since like May...

Yeah, but it's superstar of the year, not superstar since May. Reigns accomplished less than Daniel Bryan and hasn't wrestled since September.

But then again, it's just fans of RAW so I do understand this is how a lot of them think. Short memories have to be forgiven when every main event is the greatest of all time and every champion becomes the greatest of all time as soon as they win the belt. I mean, John Cena won for 2012 when CM Punk was champ all year.

 

[Just Kevin]

For a go home show this was absolutely terrible..

The Good:

1. The lead up to the Ambrose/Wyatt TLC match was pretty good... the ambulance thing has been used in the past but was effective none the less.
2. Mick Foley as Santa and Noelle Foley as his elf once again stole the show.

The Bad:

1. This whole Miz/Uso/Naomi soap opera crap is ridiculous.. keep that shit on Total Divas please.
2. Why was Show wrestling Cena and Rowan wrestling Harper?... made no sense to me that there was no buildup for any other match but the TLC match.. unless you want to call that clusterfuck at the end of the show buildup.
3. The Slammy Awards... utterly boring.

The Ugly:

1. Fandango
2. Adam Rose
3. Charlotte debuting only to job to Natalya... made no sense to me.. one of the worst booking decisions I've seen all year.. let's hope they treat The Ascension better.
4. The 3 token black guys of the WWE coming out dancing and waving their arms around as if the are not a serious group at all... terrible gimmick that is making a joke out of Woods, Kingston, and Big E... I predict the group will break up in 2 months or less.. or will o the Los Matadores route and disappear for months before reappearing again.

4/10

 

[ShaRpY HaRdY]

The Ugly:

3. Charlotte debuting only to job to Natalya... made no sense to me.. one of the worst booking decisions I've seen all year.. let's hope they treat The Ascension better.
4/10

They don't want to make her a superchick like Paige failed up to be, they want to make her look like a legit person in the ring, Natty is a good person to job to first.. watch Natty vs Charlotte @ TLC&S.. Charlotte will go over, I like the call to be honest.

 

[ShaRpY HaRdY]

Forgot to post my rating but I give it a 6/10, My boy Sandow looked good again and won a Slammy so that's cool with me.. some reviewers were saying that Sandow deserves even more than what they thought just from that tag match where Miz got destroyed.

 

[Snowman1]

Well, Brock Lesnar had 3 matches (Sure they were bigger than all of Reigns' matches combined) and Daniel Bryan hasn't been here since like May...

cool, then give it to Rollins.

Wait, Charlotte debuted? Boo!

 

[Prince Bálor]

Watching this right now... Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst. Will rate/review it later.

 

[Jacob Fox]

cool, then give it to Rollins.

Wait, Charlotte debuted? Boo!

Agreed. And assuming the vote was legit, not doctored by WWE, Reigns winning solidifies the chances that Reigns will indeed be the man who takes Lesnar down. A legit vote tells WWE that enough of its viewers want to see it. Sigh.

 

[CM Punk]

Even though Lesnar should have won, lol at people complaining about Reigns winning.

> OMG Reigns won, he did nothing in 2014
> He got the most eliminatons in the RR match which is more prestigious than MITB. He barely got pinned and was most likely undefeated in single matches.

> He can't wrestle
> I'd like to see you try and do better.

> He only does 5 moves
> So do Daniel Bryan, CM Punk, Triple H, Cena, etc.

Goddamm Internet nerds.

 

[Jacob Fox]

I actually have to admit I agree with all your points, except for the answer of liking to see a fan wrestle better.. Just because a fan can't wrestle as good as Roman Reigns does not make him a good wrestler. We are hardly the measuring stick.

 

[Roadster]

cool, then give it to Rollins.

Wait, Charlotte debuted? Boo!

It was an NXT match to hype the PPV.

 

[Rogue]

Even though Lesnar should have won, lol at people complaining about Reigns winning.

> OMG Reigns won, he did nothing in 2014
> He got the most eliminatons in the RR match which is more prestigious than MITB. He barely got pinned and was most likely undefeated in single matches.

> He can't wrestle
> I'd like to see you try and do better.

> He only does 5 moves
> So do Daniel Bryan, CM Punk, Triple H, Cena, etc.

Goddamm Internet nerds.

It's not that, I just don't think that it was the smart move to give it to him this year when he's supposed to have a big next year. That's if it's rigged. I mean, he's supposed to win the Rumble, conquer Lesnar at WMXXXI, get cashed in on, and probably get a second title reign. All in the span of 2015. So, why give him the title of ‘Superstar of the year’ for 2014?

I mean, he COULD win it twice in a row. But why pass up on giving it to Bryan this year? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not Bryan's biggest fan and I know that he’s missed several months, but he’s accomplished a whole lot in the time he was on TV. Hell, even Lesnar has more claim to it.(It wouldn't have happened though since he’s a heel and it's supposed to reflect the fan's stance. Same with Rollins.)