The WWE now have 4 first run shows with a total of 6 hours of programming. Are they over exposing themselves? Do you think there is TOO MUCH WWE going on? I mean as much as I like the idea of Superstars, does the WWE really need a 4th and now a rumored FIFTH show?
Overexposure
- Thread starter Kaedon
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Airfixx
Guest
^^^"Rumoured fifth?" What gives...? Any links...?
Firstly, take out the adverts and shit and were down to 4hrs 20 a week and probably 15 matches per week (inc. Divas)... As long as we don't see an influx of potentially exciting match ups being thrown away on Thursday nights with crappy endings (tenuously) in the name of storyline development then I don't think it's too much of a worry.... My main concern is that they'll have very little fresh for the 2nd half of the draft year.
Firstly, take out the adverts and shit and were down to 4hrs 20 a week and probably 15 matches per week (inc. Divas)... As long as we don't see an influx of potentially exciting match ups being thrown away on Thursday nights with crappy endings (tenuously) in the name of storyline development then I don't think it's too much of a worry.... My main concern is that they'll have very little fresh for the 2nd half of the draft year.
MikeRaw
Guest
Absolutely. Especiallyconsidering ECW and Superstars aren't seen in alot of countries, including Canada. They should've perfected what they had before adding on. And Airfixx, there is a runoured 5th. It's in the News section in the thread about the Shareholders meeting. Vince said he wants a Wednesday Night show.