Open ended idea: Book more triple threats on free TV

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Red Rain

The Bully
Technician
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,711
Reaction score
2,693
Points
0
Location
your mom's bed
Would it be cool if WWE started doing more triple threat matches on free TV, on occasion?
I realize the bread and butter of big draws is always the standard one-on-match.
If booked correctly, triple threat matches can draw more interest and create unique dynamics on TV
--- You involve more competitors but it gives the audience the opportunity to choose one-on-one feuds based on their reactions to different spots during the match.
---Triple threats allow competitors to rest and create surprising interactions you wouldn't generally expect, especially if it gives more ring time to an unseasoned worker.
--- A triple threat also allows two people who hate each other to be in a match without interacting much thus ruining a huge payoff on a PPV.

This shakes things up and if subscriptions fall, do away with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prince Bálor

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Chicago
I like triple threats, in certain cases, and WWE could do more of them. But, nothing beats a singles match of you ask me. Just 2 of the best, in their division, fighting it out.

Triple threats shake it up but having them too often can ruin their special feel.
 

Red Rain

The Bully
Technician
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,711
Reaction score
2,693
Points
0
Location
your mom's bed
I like triple threats, in certain cases, and WWE could do more of them. But, nothing beats a singles match of you ask me. Just 2 of the best, in their division, fighting it out.

Triple threats shake it up but having them too often can ruin their special feel.
I agree they have a special feel but so did suicide dives.
Standard matches are extremely boring which is why the high spot was created.
Being afraid to use them on tv for PPV sake is being too conventional.
I agree with you, in part, because we've been conditioned as such.

I accept your argument, but would like to see subscribers drop after implementation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edge4ever

The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
37
I wouldn't mind seeing them implemented more, but I don't think this will have any real positive long or even short-term effect either way. Is anyone, let alone a significant enough number of people, seriously gonna start becoming more invested in the product just because more three-way matches are being booked on TV?
 
  • Like
Reactions: edge4ever

Red Rain

The Bully
Technician
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,711
Reaction score
2,693
Points
0
Location
your mom's bed
I wouldn't mind seeing them implemented more, but I don't think this will have any real positive long or even short-term effect either way. Is anyone, let alone a significant enough number of people, seriously gonna start becoming more invested in the product just because more three-way matches are being booked on TV?
If the matches are booked with effort, hopefully so.
Triple threats build drama so easily on their own that the underdog element is heightened exponentially.
People would be less likely to pass on triple threat matches considering their success rate.

Increasing the storytelling and action while cutting down on individual workload would hopefully increase interest in the in-ring product.

Conditioning the audience to understand what triple threats bring to tv match is key.
 

Mr. Roman Empire

The Game
Main Eventer
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
11,635
Reaction score
2,227
Points
0
Age
33
Location
HELL
triple threat matches are apparently pretty tough to work and choreograph for the superstars which is probably why they don't happen very often because most WWE matches follow the same routine and formula nowadays
 

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Chicago
triple threat matches are apparently pretty tough to work and choreograph for the superstars which is probably why they don't happen very often because most WWE matches follow the same routine and formula nowadays
I don't get how they could be any harder than tag matches? The formula seems simple. 2 usually beat one down... 2 fight. It switches etc
 

Mr. Roman Empire

The Game
Main Eventer
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
11,635
Reaction score
2,227
Points
0
Age
33
Location
HELL
I don't get how they could be any harder than tag matches? The formula seems simple. 2 usually beat one down... 2 fight. It switches etc

a tag match is still much different. the pace of the match is more steady. in a triple threat its a constant 3 man dance and somebody has to try to lead 2 instead of 1 so it has to be vey well thought out. i love a good triple threat done right tho. One of my favorite matches so far this year was Lesanr vs Cena vs Rollins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edge4ever

Red Rain

The Bully
Technician
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,711
Reaction score
2,693
Points
0
Location
your mom's bed
I don't get how they could be any harder than tag matches? The formula seems simple. 2 usually beat one down... 2 fight. It switches etc
I assume he means that the timing must be right to avoid sloppy or rushed finishes.
If you watch the Rollins/Lesnar/Cena triple threat from Royal Rumble 2015, you'll notice Lesnar asking if it was okay to get up after the announcing desk spot.
If a resting competitor arises too soon, he could easily throw off the timing for the rest of the bout.
This becomes more of an issue in, say, a MITB ladder match but this is what I believe stonecoldsamadams was alluding to.

By and large, in a tag bout, the resting guy will know its time to get up when the crowd begins to heat up for the hot tag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: edge4ever

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Chicago
I see what you're both saying. Idk I mean I guess it's "harder" but I certainly think they could do it more. Like every couple months or so, have a triple threat for a mid car title or something.
 

Prince Bálor

I'm kind of a big deal
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
24,384
Reaction score
6,635
Points
0
Location
Serbia
I'm more than cool with triple-threats being implemented more often.

To answer this:
This shakes things up and if subscriptions fall, do away with it.
The Rock is the cure for that. Just watch it happen.
 

Neptune

我很喜歡吃餅乾
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
9,768
Reaction score
1,127
Points
0
TT's do a good job at drawing people to watch but as mentioned above, they are hard to execute properly so they don't do them as often. I wouldn't mind seeing them more, heck, fatal four-ways would be fun to see more often as well.
 

Mr. Roman Empire

The Game
Main Eventer
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Messages
11,635
Reaction score
2,227
Points
0
Age
33
Location
HELL
I assume he means that the timing must be right to avoid sloppy or rushed finishes.
If you watch the Rollins/Lesnar/Cena triple threat from Royal Rumble 2015, you'll notice Lesnar asking if it was okay to get up after the announcing desk spot.
If a resting competitor arises too soon, he could easily throw off the timing for the rest of the bout.
This becomes more of an issue in, say, a MITB ladder match but this is what I believe stonecoldsamadams was alluding to.

By and large, in a tag bout, the resting guy will know its time to get up when the crowd begins to heat up for the hot tag.

Speaking of money in the bank. The MITB match this year was terrible for that reason. A lot of the match was a basically a 1 on 1 with all the other superstars laying outside o the ring and rotating positions