No women's title on the line at 'Mania?

[MikeRaw]

Anyone else think this is stupid?
I mean, I could see if it was like, a bikini contest, or something like that. Obviousl in that case the title wouldn't, and shouldn't, be on the line. But this 25 diva battle royale thing is an actual match. So why don't they have the title on the line? What the fuck is a "Miss.Wrestlemania"?
The only reason I can think of is because they're going to have someone like Mae Young win the match, and they can't have her have the title also. If that's the case, it logicallymakes sense, but is still stupid.
In a match like that, they should at least have the title on the line.
Anyone agree?

 

[Airfixx]

Not too fussed.

Like most things, If they had no plans or intentions then IMO let's not waste valuable card-time on it.

IMO, the battle royal looks like more fun than just ya typical women's match anyway...

 

[comicgeekelly]

In my opinion they should just unify the two women's belts and just have one champion defend it on all of the shows.

 

[Next Big Thing]

In my opinion they should just unify the two women's belts and just have one champion defend it on all of the shows.

I hate the idea of just unifying some of the belts. I agree that it would be better with one women’s belt, and one tag belt, but not if they are just going to unify those belts and keep 2 or 3 (if you count the ECW championship) world titles. So I say unify all of the belts, or don't unify any of them.

 

[noumenon]

Well... the ECW and US title's are also wonderfully left off the card this year. I honestly can't even remember when the last time I've even seen Swagger was.
Yeah... I suppose they could have put a women's title on the line. But the question would be...which one? It wouldn't make sense to only feature one on the card (then again, they're featuring the IC and not the US). But anyway, if they weren't planning on defending either title I think a champ vs. champ match would have been the best call for this one.

 

[Moonlight Drive]

I don't give a shit tbh, the Divas match is always the toilet break anyway, I haven't watched one on PPV since Wrestlemania 22.

 

[TK.GFX]

I don't give a shit tbh, the Divas match is always the toilet break anyway, I haven't watched one on PPV since Wrestlemania 22.

I believe that even the WWE thinks like this. Notice how the diva's matches are always placed right before the main events? Perfect time to get your business done.

 

[Beer Money Army]

not too fuss, cause they usually give the playboy poser the title shot..

but mikeraw, they really should have u.s, ecw titles on the line at the great event of pro wrestling history. wrestlemania

 

[Mr.Enigma]

IMO, if they were going with this angle of Mrs. Wrestlemania or whatever they are calling the winner of the battle royal, the best way would have been to have whoever the champ of both shows was facing each other in a singles match or in a SummerSlam style match-up only at Wrestlemania. To do a battle royal in which you had to go the extra mile to get other talent to participate, to me, is ridiculous. Heck with it being WM25, I would have even gone as far as putting pride aside and bring in the current TNA womens champ and putting her in the match against the SD and RAW ladies champ even if she was not going to win just to make it worth watching.

What lame brains (WWE). Sometimes it really amazes me how much thought and creativity we have over them and they get paid all the big bucks and for what.

 

[taikimoto]

To me the divas are eye candy to look at when they enter the ring. The battle royal is a waste of six minutes.

 

[kingovkings]

I couldn't give a shit TBH. I don't really watch diva matches if Ive taped it i ff there matches or go get drink or toilet or whatever else. There is only a few divas that are worth watching IMO. The battle royal thing will be prob entertaining than some of the matches, I'm hoping Santino is involved that would own lmao. But nah I'm not arsed in it really same goes if a title was on the line makes no diff to me really.