WrestleMania No MITB at WM

[Senhor Perfect]

There was talk of doing a Money in the Bank match at WrestleMania 29 but WWE officials recently decided they do not want the match taking place on the biggest show of the year. The feeling is Money in the Bank should be left to its own pay-per-view. The idea for this year would have been to feature Ryback in the match to get him over big time but that won't be happening, at least not at WrestleMania.
Read more at http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/Will_Money_in_the_Bank_Happen_at_WrestleMania_29_Backstage_News_on_Cena_s_Rumble_Win.html#6qHYgpP6Ezbzwuee.99

What to do with Ryback?

 

[Pop Tatari]

I am sure we will have a exciting divas match to take its place.

 

[Snowman1]

Figured there would be no MITB, although they should use that to get people on the card.

Ryback? He'll either feud with Big Show (and hopefully actually hit his finisher) or team with Sheamus and some other face to take on the Shield again.

 

[Crayo]

Seems like BS. I find it hard to believe that WWE would consider a MITB match at all at Wrestlemania.

 

[Nano]

If at wrestlemania they include a MITB match I don't know, it would be a stupid thing to make a PPV with that name...

 

[Danielson]

I agree with Crayo. MITB is one of the better gimmick PPVS that the WWE has, and without the numbers in front of me, i'm assuming one of the bigger sells.

 

[Crayo]

I agree with Crayo. MITB is one of the better gimmick PPVS that the WWE has, and without the numbers in front of me, i'm assuming one of the bigger sells.

Whilst MITB has displayed great PPV's, I would much prefer to see it scrapped and have the MITB match as a Wrestlemania special. Having a briefcase holder that can cash in on either champion is so much better.

 

[Danielson]

Whilst MITB has displayed great PPV's, I would much prefer to see it scrapped and have the MITB match as a Wrestlemania special. Having a briefcase holder that can cash in on either champion is so much better.

I agree with one briefcase but I don't see why they would do it. Unless they had another viable option to replace that entire PPV.

 

[Crayo]

I agree with one briefcase but I don't see why they would do it. Unless they had another viable option to replace that entire PPV.

King of the Ring.

 

[BaraaKhalaf92]

King of the Ring.

Always thought they should revive it.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Seems like BS. I find it hard to believe that WWE would consider a MITB match at all at Wrestlemania.

They didn't. MITB has become a staple PPV and who wins those briefcases at the MITB PPV become big news.

 

[Danielson]

King of the Ring.

Not a bad idea

 

[Dat Kid1]

This rumor was around last year and it would nice to see money in the bank at Mania but now I don't think it's needed. MITB has the potential to be as big, or close to the rumble with it's own PPV. Mania on it's own is big, it doesn't need MITB and I believe last year the tag match filled that spot with that same sort of feel with all the high flying. I might like MITB at mania if the winner got to choose who they cashed in on and it was a larger match, so instead of 6 participants, maybe 8 or 10.

 

[Leo C]

Well, good. If you have a MITB PPV it's sort of silly to hold MITB matches outside of that, but I also prefer the idea of one guy who can cash in on both champions. Also curious about Ryback, I was pretty sure he'd feud with Show and beat him at WM.

 

[RoyalRaven]

I'd like to see the MITB to be cashed in on ANY championship. So for example if one member of a Tag team gets the case, should be able to cash it in on a the Tag Team belts and for things like the IC and USA championship.