I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
This data is likely an indication of whomever has 'the ball' at that time.
I enjoyed 2004 because Benoit and Guerrero had the ball at that particular time period.
2004 featured many main events centered around high quality inside the ring.
Even though I like that someone took the time to do this, my first instinct when reading it was still "Hmm... someone needs a life." It's much like the guy who earlier this year took the time and energy to review every Wrestlemania match in history and then listed them in order from best to worst: http://www.buzzfeed.com/miketchin/ranking-every-wrestlemania-match-ever-ipcp
Then again, there's no telling how many countless hours that I've spent over the years posting on message boards about wrestling that I'll never get back, so I guess I'm not one that should be throwing stones. :downer:
It's very relevant information. It gives a gauge on what a particular person's muse might truly be.
Whichever period you disliked/liked in hindsight could very well be because that particular time period didn't focus in-ring.