Meltz Van Dam report on Rock and Ryback

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
As we have noted, WWE officials are going back and forth on whether or not the Ryback vs. CM Punk TLC match will actually take place at the January 7th RAW.

With The Rock in the house that night, should they do the match, the plan would be to have The Rock at ringside. The idea is that they could hype the match up all night with the idea that it could be Ryback going on to the Royal Rumble to defend against The Rock. A source says to expect at least one segment with The Rock and Ryback that night.

- On a related note, it's said that The Rock is perfectly fine with dropping the WWE Title to John Cena at WrestleMania 29. It's been reported Rock has been under the impression that he will be the one to end CM Punk's title reign at the Royal Rumble.

lol Meltz Van Dam with his typical reporting.

Read more
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
They'll likely get out of the title match by saying (on the show) that Punk isn't cleared to wrestle just yet. But kayfabe wise, it doesn't seem fair for Ryback to have to win the Rumble when he's already guaranteed a title shot. I kinda like the idea of Rock costing Ryback the match, but making it a TLC match was stupid. If they do go through with the match, do they want Punk getting injured again with another powerbomb through a table?
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Rock costing Ryback seems stupid in my opinion. The fact they made it a TLC match though was also stupid as it gives Punk almost no way out unless they role with Shield owning Ryback AGAIN.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
That's why Rock costing Ryback the match is a good idea, since it's something that most all casual fans won't see coming. Austin did it with Owen Hart as well back at Badd Blood 1997 (helped him win the IC Title just so it could be him that he beat for the belt instead of Faarooq), and Rock could do it because he wants revenge against Punk and wants the cred for ending the second longest reigning title reign of the Mania era, which would only further add to his "Greatest Of All Time" claim.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
KevinLockard23 said:
That's why Rock costing Ryback the match is a good idea, since it's something that most all casual fans won't see coming.

Because it's illogical... It makes Ryback look pathetic if he doesn't go out to seek revenge, and if he does seek revenge then he's put in the feud which ruins Rock/Punk. It's terrible booking, and it won't happen.
 

Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
The guy is like a bad drug dealer. We all keep coming back and hanging around, hoping to see something actually worthwhile. All we get, is bullshit.
 

ThreeXBetterThanU

The Artiste
Joined
Oct 6, 2012
Messages
393
Reaction score
53
Points
0
Age
37
Re: RE: Meltz Van Dam report on Rock and Ryback

Aids Johnson said:
The guy is like a bad drug dealer. We all keep coming back and hanging around, hoping to see something actually worthwhile. All we get, is bullshit.

I don't know about your neighborhood but in mine, bad drug dealers don't last long. Either from people robbing him constantly or killing him.

As far as this idea, if Rock causes Ryback it would be a horrible idea. What i can see happening is Rock coming out, getting attacked by the Shield, forcing Ryback to act like a idiot and fight them off, thus allowing punk to win while Rock and Ryback beat up on the shield.

~Three Said That~
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
Crayo said:
Because it's illogical... It makes Ryback look pathetic if he doesn't go out to seek revenge, and if he does seek revenge then he's put in the feud which ruins Rock/Punk. It's terrible booking, and it won't happen.

It's not terrible booking, that can be taken care of with a simple "He'll win the Rumble and then chose to fight The Rock if he has the belt." And then he'll probably lose the Rumble anyway (because of The Shield) and then he'll focus back on them. It won't make him look any more pathetic than constantly fighting Punk and yet failing to capture the belt. If the third match does indeed happen, then that's the third time he's failed regardless. Yeah, it probably won't happen, but it's not a bad idea.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
Re: RE: Meltz Van Dam report on Rock and Ryback

Crayo said:
Because it's illogical... It makes Ryback look pathetic if he doesn't go out to seek revenge, and if he does seek revenge then he's put in the feud which ruins Rock/Punk. It's terrible booking, and it won't happen.

This isn't your fantasy wrecking ball sadly, it's the man who chanted feed me more with hell no.