Maybe a spoiler: Superstar sporting a new look & may return

[Crayo]

- Jack Swagger is in England for tonight’s WWE RAW. No word yet if he will be rerunning to TV. Here’s a photo of Swagger sporting a new look since we last saw him on RAW:



Read more: http://www.pwmania.com/wwe-superstar-sporting-look-wwe-tv-tapings-attendance-sin-cara-merch#ixzz2BNZVZBcV

 

[Stopspot]

He reportedly sported this new look a couple of weeks back as well.

 

[Leo C]

Cool look.

 

[GrammarNazi82]

Rerunning to TV? So he ran to TV once?

Anyway, interesting new look.



(P.S. Love you, Crayo. tunga: )

 

[GrammarNazi82]

I also love seeing Barrett in the background.

 

[seabs]

Everyone has a beard now it seems, wtf have you done Bryan you hobbit.

 

[Stopspot]

Everyone has a beard now it seems, wtf have you done Bryan you hobbit.

 

[seabs]

Such a vanilla indie darling midget, fuck that guy.

 

[Rysenberg]

Swaggie is such a boss.

 

[Crayo]

Rerunning to TV? So he ran to TV once?

Anyway, interesting new look.



(P.S. Love you, Crayo. tunga: )

I didn't write the report ity1:

 

[GrammarNazi82]

I didn't write the report ity1:

Excuses, excuses. ity: If you had noticed it in the report, you could have corrected it when you quoted it in your post. Tsk.

 

[Crayo]

Excuses, excuses. ity: If you had noticed it in the report, you could have corrected it when you quoted it in your post. Tsk.

But that would mean tampering with a news source :shock:

2-0 Crayo

 

[Lacky]

Swagger you stylish mo-fo. :gusta:

 

[GrammarNazi82]

But that would mean tampering with a news source :shock:

2-0 Crayo

:facepalm:

But, you are allowed to do that, ya know. You could even make a notation that the source was edited for grammatical mistakes if it would help you sleep better at night. Or, you could simply change rerunning to the proper use of returning and notate it as so: [returning]

Stop being a lazy twit. :

 

[Crayo]

OR I COULD JUST POST IT WITHOUT ANNOYANCES CORRECTING GRAMMAR WHICH ISN'T EVEN MINE.

IPEBOMB: