Main Stables?

[FailFaceFTW]

Unlike TNA, WWE has never had two main stables at the same time, and made them go at it. TNA had Fortune and Immortal, but all WWE had was the Corre and the Nexus, but they only fought at the Royal Rumble. If there was a stable war in WWE, who would you want in the stables to fight against each other?

 

[Senhor Perfect]

Guess you forgot DX vs NOD, Los Barricuas vs DOA.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Corporation vs MOD, before they merged ofc.

Corporation vs DX as well to some extent.

 

[Lockard 23]

Los Barracus versus the DOA was so boring.

 

[Senhor Perfect]

Los Barracus versus the DOA was so boring.

Agreed, but it happened.

 

[seabs]

The Alliance vs Team WWF?

 

[FailFaceFTW]

WWE people. Not WWF, that happened plenty of times in WWF, but what about WWE?

 

[Stopspot]

WWE people. Not WWF, that happened plenty of times in WWF, but what about WWE?

The history of the WWF carries over to the WWE. They are not two separate entities.

 

[FailFaceFTW]

I know that, But I'm talking about today's WWE, not the past.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I know that, But I'm talking about today's WWE, not the past.

Legacy vs the Mcmahons

 

[Stopspot]

DX vs Spirit Squad.

 

[Pop Tatari]

3MB vs 3 count

 

[Crayo]

Legacy vs the Mcmahons

Does that really count?

It's never been the focal point of a show though. There has been small groups vs small groups, but not like dominant heel stable vs super face stable or anything similar to Fortune vs Immortal.

 

[Danielson]

Nation of domination vs dx again.

 

[FailFaceFTW]

I like how people try and argue my point of what I said, instead of actually giving a legitimate response. And Danielson, did you read what I said on the first page?