London and Kendrick

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
527
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
36
I guess that at the house show where they won the tag team titles, it was an official change cause it's listed on WWE.com and it was on RAW. How come they never do that for other titles that have changed hands?
 

Wooderz245

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
35
I think they did this once before, when Juventud lost the Cruiserweight championship to Nunzio in Italy, but the champion always seems to winn it back before the next televised show. I think if a champion loses a title in a house show, the former champions win it back almost straight away so as to not skew the storyline on the show.
 

LKP

Guest
Yeah so why do it in the first place? So they can call themselves form tag team champions on raw? I found it pointless.
 

MikeRaw

Guest
Are you guys dumb?Maybe they won by accident cause Cade/Murdoch forgot to kick out.Well,either way theyre a great team and should have a good match at Unforgiven!
 

thedeadite

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
47
I wonder if wwe posted the title change as a punishment to cade/murdoch for the whole cryme time thing? I know that's been pointed out before, but it's seems like a viable reason. Title changes happen on house shows from time to time and it's not usually regarded anywhere but at said show(s) or in internet communities. Speaking of london and kendrick though, I've been thinking about starting to watch wwe programming again, mostly for them, punk, and a few others, just not too sure yet if it's worth the rest of it.
 

phantomgerald

Guest
It was just to make the tour more interesting, nothing wrong with that. I don't think there's a point of posting it on the records or on wwe.com, cause it'll just make L&K look weaker if they lose it so quickly.
 

OrtonIsGod

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
36
The only reason the titles changed hands was to draw more people and interest to their future encounters on the tour. It builds more interest if Londrick wins the titles, and then C&M get their rematches. Normally if this would happen, I would think it would definitely switch back before they came back from the tour, which the titles did. Again, it does kind of make Londrick look weak for the short reign, but it also lets fans know that they can beat C&M and should make their Unforgiven match pretty interesting.
 

3lions

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2002
Messages
845
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
35
There's already a thread discussing the title change. There's nothing new in this thread. So It's closed.

* Thread Closed *
 
Status
Not open for further replies.