Listening to sports radio and during an annoying ad wanted some noise in the background and turned that on, Dixie announced that the original Lockdown concept of "all matches in the steel cage" is back.
Yay?
Listening to sports radio and during an annoying ad wanted some noise in the background and turned that on, Dixie announced that the original Lockdown concept of "all matches in the steel cage" is back.
Yay?
More like stfumore like yawn
more like lick me.More like stfu
Sounds sick, Joe in a cage and motivated? Colour me excited.
It does make sense. I mean, I'm of the opinion that, if you're going to have a gimmick PPV based around a type of match, then all the matches should be in that type of match.
wk
My issue with TNA lockdown in the past was that all matches were in the cage, I think there are only so many ways a cage match can go and watching 7 or 8 cage matches is surprisingly boring.
I would rather have maybe just two cage matches at a PPV like this...this is more than adequate for a three-hour PPV.
You brought up Shaw and Anderson, well having all the matches in the cage does kinda make the matches like Shaw and Anderson seem less ridiculous. Take last year's for example, we had Kurt Angle and Wes Brisco as one of the cage matches, which shined a glaring light on it as to say "WHY IS THIS IN A CAGE"... then you add in how that AND the Main Event both ended because of outside interference (plus the Elimination Chamber finish being fresh in our minds) and... yeah, there's no point in protecting the "cage match" concept at this point. So lets just enjoy the show!
Wonder what the phrase "ppv quality" means in 2014, but will make a separate thread as that's more of a WWE complaint.
In regards to your response on Shaw Vs. Anderson I do not personally agree that the gimmick of a Cage match makes it seem less ridiculous, I guess my point was more to do with his characters build up and in-ring action so far as opposed to how the Cage will effect the contest. Myself? I would not have had this match on the card at all.
However I do agree and can understand where you are coming from when you mention Angle Vs. Brisco, this was a good contest a year ago but can Angle do it now? A year may not seem like long to you and I but Angle's body is looking worse than ever and I am worried for him.
We can assess what PPV quality means for TNA after reviewing Lockdown this sunday I guess
Thanks for the response bro
Dixie scraping the bottom of the barrell as she knows her company is over
That all makes sense. Here in fantasy-booking land, assume you'd rather save the blowoff for Bully/Anderson for Lockdown (really, Bully Freakin' Ray isn't on this card?) and I can't make an argument against that. (Also agree on your call of killing off the KO's division that's on life support right now. Once they can bring in PLENTY of new girls, bring it back.
Haha, by that I meant when you were talking about how "Does anyone think it's a PPV quality match?". Seems like most pay-per-view cards have at least 3 matches on them that aren't what you'd expect to pay for. Again that may not be as big an issue for TNA since matches on Impact exist to further storylines and here they get more of a chance to stand alone.