Lance Storm On How WWE Is Booking Brock Lesnar

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Saylor

Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
193
Points
63
Age
29
Website
www.wweforums.net
Lance Storm was a guest Sunday night on The LAW chatting Ring of Honor's Border Wars event this Saturday night from the Ted Reeve Arena in Toronto. During the interview, Storm discussed the booking of Brock Lesnar since his return.

"I certainly would have had Brock win [at Extreme Rules], as most people seem to think was the better idea," said Storm. "I just took exception to the people that thought that one loss killed Brock, and they've completely destroyed his heat, and what's the point? There was a lot of people wanting to think that they had just completely ruined the whole potential of Brock Lesnar. So, I pitched an alternative booking strategy with, 'Okay, he lost, it's not the end of the world.'

"Comparing it to his UFC run, in that he was a big draw for UFC and he tapped out in 90 seconds in his first match, I'm a firm believer that one loss or one match doesn't make or break anyone. It certainly can help, but it's not the be-all and end-all. So I pitched an alternative booking strategy for Brock, which they're obviously going a different way after watching Monday, but it's an interesting read. I'll be curious to see where they do go, because I really liked the approach that I had, although I'm curious that they seem to be sitting him for several months. I'm curious how many dates they have on Brock. Maybe there is something to fewer and far-between being good, but I would think if say you only had him for 15 dates, that you'd want 12 of those to be pay-per-view matches that could draw you money. It seems odd to have him on four or five TVs in a row and then skip several PPVs, but that's just me I guess.

"I think it comes down to whether they have a good booking plan or not. Steve Austin and The Rock in the heyday were week-to-week characters, and it certainly didn't hurt their drawing power. I think it comes down to if you know what you're doing and have a really good plan, you can keep a guy important and special and have him on every show. I'm not even necessarily pitching that, but to me, with the price tag that's with him, you would think you would want him drawing money on as many PPVs as possible. Having him do a TV appearance where he just signs a contract, as opposed to wrestling on a PPV, it's an interesting decision as far as how you maximize his profits. If they don't have a lot of great ideas to keep him fresh on TV, then perhaps sending him away for a month or so, and then bringing him back for SummerSlam, and then bringing him back for (Royal) Rumble, maybe that is the best approach. He's really only drawing you money when he's on PPV, so you would think you'd want him on a few of those to make up for that paycheck."

Source: WI.

I personally think Lance Storm is correct and what he's said is logically fair. I can understand reasons for making John Cena win at Extreme Rules from WWE's Administrative point of view however I think what Lance Storm as said is true and I think he know's what he's talking about when it comes to discussions like these to say the least. Not only do I agree with what he had to say in regards to Cena but what he's said on Brock Lesnar's appearances is also pretty simple and Lance Storm stated the obvious that WWE failed to do.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Pretty much what I said. One loss doesn't ruin the mystique of Brock, he had Cena pinned for 10 and Cena had to cheat to win. Then he goes and breaks HHH's arm.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
It doesn't really ruin the mystique or anything, but I still think it would've been better if he won. I agree with Storm when he says they should use him on lots of PPVs, that's pretty obvious in my opinion. If he has limited appearances, use him on dates that make you money.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Seriously. If you have Brock for 1 year and he misses even a single PPV you are fucking up royally. A guy of Brock's stature can elevate a worker even if he is kicking their ass.
 

Saylor

Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
4,760
Reaction score
193
Points
63
Age
29
Website
www.wweforums.net
Brock Lesnar should be appearing on all Paper-views including WrestleMania, obviously. That's where you'll make the big money off him. He's sold the most paper-views in the history of UFC so if he's done that, what does it tell the WWE. It show's them that he's a paper-view selling machine, look at how great Extreme Rules match was. Sometimes I don't understand the WWE.
 

Testify

Bully
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
15,948
Reaction score
3,135
Points
0
Location
Nashville, TN
Website
i.imgur.com
Wacokid27 said:
Does anybody know where Lance Storm is from?

wk

From that suckhole country they call Canada (and I apologize to all the Mexicans out there). :steiner:

#KillingYourEnemiesWithWordsOfTruth
 

Wacokid27

The Dark Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
11,540
Reaction score
2,235
Points
0
Location
The Rock Ridge Jail
Crayo said:
No idea mate.

Sorry. That was from his time in WCW when he would come out and announce that he was from "Calgary......AlBERTa, Canada" and then they'd play the Canadian national anthem.

Just gave me a chuckle to ask.

wk