Is Jim Ross crazy, or does he have a point?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
On the return of Hulk Hogan:

Great pop for Hulk Hogan and did you notice that WWE gave Hulk his spotlight uninterruptedly and did not align him with anyone nor did they have anyone confront Hogan…..yet. Good to see Hulk back on WWE airwaves. Hogan was more 'over' in 5 minutes on WWE TV than he ever was on TNA Impact.
From what I saw, Hulk was sometimes the only thing that was over in TNA. I hated the fact he got so much pops at one point. I understand sometimes it dwindled out and you witnessed more frustrated fans than anything, but is this another case of JR just saying anything that will please WWE? The dude is a legend but I can't help but sometimes feel his blogs are Blue. The continuous defence of the Bryan storyline(s) and now this? Felt like I needed to make this rant to please Testify.
 

Testify

Bully
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
15,948
Reaction score
3,135
Points
0
Location
Nashville, TN
Website
i.imgur.com
JR is liar when when he claims that Hogan is more over in 5 mins in WWE than in 4 yrs in TNA, dead wrong, and anyone who watched at least 10 episodes featuring Hogan in the past 4 yrs will agree with me. Hogan was the most over guy in TNA for nearly 4 f'n years. Only Hardy, Angle and sometimes Styles came close to him.

Enough said