News Interview with Jerry Jarrett

[Stopspot]

http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/ne...-Wrestlers.htm

http://www.insidetheropes.co.uk/#!vip/cvnq

In an interview with Inside The Ropes, Jerry Jarrett, the founder of TNA, said that Dixie Carter shouldn't be focusing on former WWE wrestlers. Here are highlights:

On Dixie's non-wrestling background and how that effects her running a wrestling company: "You've got to have an unabiding respect for the business or it's impossible to be successful. When I was in the wrestling business, me and the wrestling business were intertwined. I ate it, slept it, dreamt it. The wrestling business was my mistress. Dixie saw her first match after she had ownership, I think and I know for a fact she has little regard for the tradition or the history of the business. So, if you don't know what brought you to the dance, how are you supposed to learn from it and build on it. After all this years, it's pretty obvious that I'm right. TNA today is as closed to being a non factor in the business as you can get."

Thoughts on TNA's focus on ex-WWE talents: "That's one of the mistakes they made. They can't seem to get past the fact that when you bring in guys that WWE has let go, fans are going to see them as yesterday's soup. But of course you have to have someone who knows how to cultivate and create talent otherwise you have no choice but to use whoever's available, thats named talent. It's pretty obvious that they don't have anybody that knows how to create talent. I'm guessing, because I haven't seen the show in 2-3 years, but I'm sure there's talent there that could be superstars. Truth, Ron Killings was in TNA and then you saw when he went to WWE how Vince made him into a superstar. In the wrestling business, it's really not any secret, it's understanding that if you're making a movie. what are the ingredients you need? A compelling storyline, a great producer/director and great talent. You mix those ingredients and you get great cinema. But if you take this great star or talent and put him in a stinking movie with a stinking producer director, what do you get? and the wrestling business is a dance between the promoter or booker or writer and the talent. They have to be on the same page and they both have to be good."

TNA's future: "I am amazed, because when I was there, Bob Carter called me at least two to three times a week and said "I can't lose any more money, Jerry" and I said "You're needing to talk to your daughter, not to me. She's running the place"So I'm amazed that they are in business. I think at this point, it'safe to say that TNA will continue to be subsidized by Bob Carter until he dies. Then I think TNA will go the way of ECW and the territory days."

 

[JC4Life37]

I want the footage where Ron Killings was a bigger superstar in WWE than he was in TNA

I appreciate Jarrett's acumen....but where does he get off telling a #2 company how to get back to business?...its unfair cause not even Paul Heyman is qualified in such a matter


I'm not sure Jerry Jarrett is qualified to tell TNA how to fix their problems

 

[Leo C]

I think Jerry has a few points here. It's obvious that giving someone who's never watched wrestling the most power in a wrestling company is a bad move. Him saying TNA is irrelevant is really something relative. When you compare the money guys can make and the exposure guys get to most of the indies, then he's wrong, sure. But when you compare it to WWE/mainstream (and possibly even some Japan stuff if we're talking about effect in the correspondent countries) he may have a point. Also good point in the WWE guys being seen as yesterday's soup.

 

[Testify]

Clearly he doesn't not give a shit about TNA, he hasn't seen the show in 3 years, wow.

And yeah, good old Truth, headlining PPVs every month, and main-eventing Raw every week... remind me who made him a multi-time World Champion, already ? Oh, yeah, TNA.

He has a few good points, but lol, it's a shame the TNA co-founder sounds this bitter.