In the hypothetical scenario where Undertaker loses at Wrestlemania...

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Who would you want him to put over? Which young superstar would get the best rub that he would use for the next 5-10 years of his career? Which young superstar would contribute enough to make the feud historic? Or perhaps would you give it to an old timer?

In my opinion, it would have to be Ambrose. Fanboyism aside, he's one of their most talented prospects and his gimmick would use this opportunity to the best ability.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
Fanboyism not aside, I choose Ziggler.

Fanboyism aside, definitely not Ambrose lol. Wyatt dog. Wyatt.
 

Farooq

Chairwoman of The New Day
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,193
Reaction score
7,027
Points
0
Location
619
Darren Young. Darren will bury Undertaker in a rainbow coffin, and put the LGBT flag on the burial site and Another One Bites the Dust by Queen will play when he wins.
 

Chaz

The Artiste
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
173
Reaction score
60
Points
0
Age
31
Kane, just because.
 

Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
As much as I'd love it to be Ambrose I'd say Reigns would probably get a better rub of it.
 

Trip in the Head

Jester of Darkness
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
14,361
Reaction score
4,279
Points
0
Age
43
Location
Maine
Fanboyism not aside, I choose Ziggler.

Fanboyism aside, definitely not Ambrose lol. Wyatt dog. Wyatt.

I would have to agree with the vote for Wyatt. Almost like one creepy guy getting over an another. If they wanted to take that storyline even farther I would say they let Wyatt work his magic (or trance, whatever) on Undertaker and add him to the fold. Especially if that's what happens with Kane. I could only imagine the fan reactions.
 

Hannah Bee

PhilWres Babe
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
3,805
Reaction score
325
Points
0
Age
28
Location
England/Manila, Philippines
Website
www.twitter.com
I want it to be on an old-timer. Using it to push a (relatively) new guy (or a midcarder) is not a good idea. It's like you would like to project that hey, Undertaker can be beaten by a new guy lolwashedup. This is just my opinion tho.

Fangirlism clutched against my chest? Randy Orton

Fangirlism buried to the ground? Kane. Trust me, it'll make more sense.
 

Roi

Champion
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
9,978
Reaction score
1,768
Points
0
Age
28
Location
Spain
Ambrose or Wyatt wouldnt put a hell of a match. They arent good enough in the ring. Maybe the build would be awesome but...It would be kinda like Punk + Do you think this Wyatt stuff can be forever? In about 5 years time, he will change gimmick or whatever.

If the streak has to be broken, I would give it to a guy who will most likely carry the company for the next 10 years. Bryan or Ziggler.

Inb4 The WWE gives the streak to Punk. You know, kinda like they did at MITB11, just for him to accept a new contract
 

Wacokid27

The Dark Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
11,540
Reaction score
2,235
Points
0
Location
The Rock Ridge Jail
Taker has apparently made it known in the past that he will not put over an "old-timer" at Wrestlemania. He's not a fan of the Streak, but, if they're going to make a big deal out of it, he didn't want it to be ended by a guy near the end of his in-ring career. Rumor has it that he tried to give it to Angle a few years back, then Orton, but Vince said no. Further rumor has it that the plan was to have Punk go over him at Mania 29, but Percy's/Paul's death made them change their mind. They didn't like how far Punk and Undertaker took using the death to build heat (it is worth mentioning that these same rumors say that Undertaker was 100% in support of all of Punk's antics and actually thought that Percy would love the idea that, even in death, he was a big deal in a big-time feud). Had it been anybody but Punk, they would have ended up in the doghouse, but his power backstage is enormous (in a lot of people's eyes, he's actually taken the locker-room leader role that guys like Undertaker and JBL have had in the past).

Either way, the way they "punished" Punk was by not allowing Taker to put him over at Mania. This has led to speculation that there will be a Punk-Undertaker II, in which Punk will go over. Considering his current level of face-hood, though, this is being questioned. Of course, Punk's character, like Austin's before it, is the kind of face that can be heelish and even accomplish the ultimate heel act of beating Undertaker at Wrestlemania, or at least that's what several people are saying (I've even heard the rumor that HHH is one of the folks saying that).

Which is to say that I figure, if they ever do end the streak, it will go to Punk at Wrestlemania XXX. If not, all bets are off as to whether it ever ends.

wk
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
I don't buy that Punk was ever supposed to end the streak. His match with Taker this year was technically a thrown together match. They knew they wanted Rock/Cena II and HHH/Brock II so with Punk being outed from the main event and Undertaker's streak being defended at the event as it is every year, they put them together because where else would Punk have landed on the card? Their lazy build with focusing on mocking Bearer's death (which one week featured nothing more than Punk juggling the urn and then one week Taker just appearing out of nowhere and punching Punk and the fact that Taker barely said anything the entire feud) pretty much confirms it for me. Never mind that people knew for awhile beforehand that Punk was taking time off after Wrestlemania. Also, no reasonable person should think Punk/Undertaker II is happening. The chance for Punk to end the streak (I like Punk but he'd be a terrible choice either way IMO) has passed.

I personally don't believe the streak is ever ending. I think the only time it was ever in serious jeopardy was against Randy Orton at WM21, and that itself was only a few years after they began acknowledging Taker's win record as an actual streak on-screen. The streak is much bigger now and I don't think they'll ever trust giving that humongous accolade to anyone at this point, not even Cena. Too much risk involved giving to a new guy as he may not work out in the long run (imagine if Lesnar had ended it at WM19 or something... then he would have walked out on WWE a year later and took that accolade with him) and there's no point in giving it to someone who is already established. A guy like Cena may be handed just about every kind of victory there is by WWE, but he's peaked. He can't really get any bigger (in his current baby face role) than he already is, and the same goes for any other established star. (And I don't buy into the "Cena will end it as a way of turning heel" theory.)
 

DK JAMES

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
20,610
Reaction score
3,120
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Buffalo, NY
Favorite Wrestler
themiz
Favorite Wrestler
johncena2
Favorite Wrestler
akiratozawa
Someone in the Shield probably. Cesaro would be badass but I don't see that happening.
 

Wacokid27

The Dark Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
11,540
Reaction score
2,235
Points
0
Location
The Rock Ridge Jail
I don't buy that Punk was ever supposed to end the streak. His match with Taker this year was technically a thrown together match. They knew they wanted Rock/Cena II and HHH/Brock II so with Punk being outed from the main event and Undertaker's streak being defended at the event as it is every year, they put them together because where else would Punk have landed on the card? Their lazy build with focusing on mocking Bearer's death (which one week featured nothing more than Punk juggling the urn and then one week Taker just appearing out of nowhere and punching Punk and the fact that Taker barely said anything the entire feud) pretty much confirms it for me. Never mind that people knew for awhile beforehand that Punk was taking time off after Wrestlemania. Also, no reasonable person should think Punk/Undertaker II is happening. The chance for Punk to end the streak (I like Punk but he'd be a terrible choice either way IMO) has passed.

I personally don't believe the streak is ever ending. I think the only time it was ever in serious jeopardy was against Randy Orton at WM21, and that itself was only a few years after they began acknowledging Taker's win record as an actual streak on-screen. The streak is much bigger now and I don't think they'll ever trust giving that humongous accolade to anyone at this point, not even Cena. Too much risk involved giving to a new guy as he may not work out in the long run (imagine if Lesnar had ended it at WM19 or something... then he would have walked out on WWE a year later and took that accolade with him) and there's no point in giving it to someone who is already established. A guy like Cena may be handed just about every kind of victory there is by WWE, but he's peaked. He can't really get any bigger (in his current baby face role) than he already is, and the same goes for any other established star. (And I don't buy into the "Cena will end it as a way of turning heel" theory.)


Just talking rumors and hypotheticals, bub. No reason to say I'm not reasonable.

wk