If TNA starts booking at bigger stadiums can they become WWE level?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


William

The Lunatic Fringe
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
2,089
Reaction score
78
Points
0
I was just thinking that TNA is currently the best professional wrestling company in the world, So why aren't they at WWE's level?

Is it because none of their talent is well known? Not really they have guys like Hulk Hogan, Jeff Hardy, Sting, Rob Van Dam and Kurt Angle and on top of all them they have some of the best up and coming stars and some of the best indy wrestlers there is. So it's not that.

Is it the commentary? It could be but I don't think the commentary will stop people from watching a great show! If Taz and Tenay showed more emotion and don't just act all :downer: the whole show it would seem a lot better. I mean Austin Aries breaking Roode's streak was a big deal! And the commentators were just like :finger: We're to cool to act suprised. If they got some better commentators or if the current ones show a little more emotion that could help but it wouldn't fix their problem..

The last thing I thought was is it because they book in small arenas? And I think that could be the answer, At Slammiversary they looked like a big wrestling company. Why? Because they were in a big arena. Their normal shows just seem like an Indy Fed with HD Cameras and on tv. I think that if TNA got bigger stadiums to perform in and didn't stay in only the one spot they'd become more well known and they'd look better because they would have more people there.

Does anybody else feel this way?
 

Matt

Champion
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
17,129
Reaction score
606
Points
0
Age
17
Talent and quality doesn't automatically mean success. that's the way the world is. If they started going to large arenas, would they be able to fill them?
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
They don't fill small arenas a lot of the time, so no, booking larger venues doesn't solve anything. It's all about exposure and marketing.
 

William

The Lunatic Fringe
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
2,089
Reaction score
78
Points
0
Guess you guys are right...Any ideas on how you think TNA could get more exposure?
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Not really. Put more money into advertising campaigns is about all they can do at this point in my eyes
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
They need to make TNA look bigger. Their commentary team is diabolical, they sound so low quality. The impact zone is a joke, how can you have your best PPV in that tiny shithole? The graphics are terrible. The advertising is terrible (possibly due to lack of funds), their marketing in general is poor. The answer to this question used to be "Because TNA does too many Blue things", which they did, but now they're on the ball, we'll just have to wait and see where it takes them.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
the thing wayyyyyyy too many people fail to realize is that TNA is doing extraordinary. They are 10 years old, and universally recognized as the #2 wrestling promotion globally. These things take time, you don't just roll out of bed and wake up on WWE's level.
 

Matt

Champion
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
17,129
Reaction score
606
Points
0
Age
17
William said:
Guess you guys are right...Any ideas on how you think TNA could get more exposure?

stop being so crap at advertising :lol1:
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Advertising is one of the first ways to fix that. And it doesn't have to cost much. Social media is a great way to start and get that initial buzz, once that works and they get more revenue from more people watching their shows they can start doing more TV ads.
 

Y2J Enigma

The Artiste
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
626
Reaction score
17
Points
0
A simple change of arenas and cities might make a small impact, by adding more fans from around the country, but nothing big enough to put them onto WWE's level. And that's kind of sad, considering that WWE is in one of it's weakest times in history at the moment. What they should do is start taking advantage of the tag team division some more, as WWE i currently shit there. After the tag division, they could build new superstars from there. Even then they might not be on their opponent's level. :haha:
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Stopspot said:
Advertising is one of the first ways to fix that. And it doesn't have to cost much. Social media is a great way to start and get that initial buzz, once that works and they get more revenue from more people watching their shows they can start doing more TV ads.

Advertising costs a ton. Television ads anyway. They already whore social networks.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Y2J Enigma said:
A simple change of arenas and cities might make a small impact, by adding more fans from around the country, but nothing big enough to put them onto WWE's level. And that's kind of sad, considering that WWE is in one of it's weakest times in history at the moment. What they should do is start taking advantage of the tag team division some more, as WWE i currently s*** there. After the tag division, they could build new superstars from there. Even then they might not be on their opponent's level. :haha:

1.) WWE is only at a weak point from a product/booking standpoint. Yea, most smarks hate the current product, but from a business perspective WWE is still kicking ass and taking names
2.) TNA has an even weaker tag division than WWE at this point. They no longer have Beer Money, the Guns, or any of the teams that used to make that division worth a damn. And they also don't need it to make new stars. Aries is the hottest thing in wrestling right now and TNA built him up in just 1 year's time.
3.) Again, people expect too much from TNA. This company is 10 years old and WWE has been around forever. WWE is the #1 thing people think about when they think pro wrestling. To try and act like it's some sort of slight against TNA that they aren't on WWE's level is nonsensical
 

Roach

Inappropriately dressed Walmart shopper
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
1,026
Reaction score
40
Points
0
Age
44
Location
Manchester, UK
Website
www.dogforo.co.uk
If they advertise and get bigger events then yes. WWE started small they just need the investors to take a chance. TNA could even do better if they do not go PG.