Hayley Williams and more..

[Captain Awesome]

Here's some newer stuff.

Comments? ​

 

[seX-Power]

Amazing. Would I be able to use the 4th sig there (the 2nd Hayley one)?

 

[Wordlife]

OMG! Love the sigs!

 

[noumenon]

Nice work.
sooooooooo...what's that sparkly stuff coming off of Jeff..

 

[C4]

They're all very simple which makes them attractive. Let me start with the first one, decent signature with a nice border around it. The text should be removed or be white to make it more visible imo. Also, the bottom right is kinda blurry. But overall, it's pretty nice.

- The second one, love the Polaroid thingy you got there. Nice, simple background and text, but again try it out as white and add a little stroke to it. Would look better, I guess.

- The third one, kinda bad compared to the first two. Actually, the only problem here is that there is a lot of empty space and the background is nothing too attractive. You should have worked on a smaller scale imo. And I would give you the same advice with the font colour. Try it out and see how it goes.

- The fourth one, sexy. That describes the graphic. You've used simple but effective techniques and god, it's turned out to be brilliant, honestly. Again, I love the simplicity of the signature. Good choice of yours not to have text in there.

- The fifth one, another pretty good signature, what's that font called?

- The sixth one, the text looks OK. Love the simplicity here as well but don't really like the text in there, floating on top of the signature. Almost looks like a watermark. Rest looks pretty darn awesome. What do you do to get that sweet effect on the main image? Levels adjustment?

 

[Captain Awesome]

They're all very simple which makes them attractive. Let me start with the first one, decent signature with a nice border around it. The text should be removed or be white to make it more visible imo. Also, the bottom right is kinda blurry. But overall, it's pretty nice.

- The second one, love the Polaroid thingy you got there. Nice, simple background and text, but again try it out as white and add a little stroke to it. Would look better, I guess.

- The third one, kinda bad compared to the first two. Actually, the only problem here is that there is a lot of empty space and the background is nothing too attractive. You should have worked on a smaller scale imo. And I would give you the same advice with the font colour. Try it out and see how it goes.

- The fourth one, sexy. That describes the graphic. You've used simple but effective techniques and god, it's turned out to be brilliant, honestly. Again, I love the simplicity of the signature. Good choice of yours not to have text in there.

- The fifth one, another pretty good signature, what's that font called?

- The sixth one, the text looks OK. Love the simplicity here as well but don't really like the text in there, floating on top of the signature. Almost looks like a watermark. Rest looks pretty darn awesome. What do you do to get that sweet effect on the main image? Levels adjustment?

For the third one, I knew it was going to be the worst one. I love the picture for it, but I messed it up horribly. I'm set to try it out again.

Thanks for liking the fourth one. I was actually unsure if anyone would like it, since it seemed like it was coming off a bit messy.I originally had text there, but took it off as the sig progressed.

The fifth sig's font is a random cursive font on my computer. I know it was there when I first got the computer, XP, and well I applied an effect to it and messed around a bit with it.

On the last one, I honestly didn't know what to do and I figured the text would look nice there, but I suppose not. Also, I first start off with gradients, working a bit with the gain merge, addition, saturation, and all of that sorts. Then I may go into curves and work with that or sometimes go into Quibst and choose a texture from that. Then I may use a vintage lighting effect on it or some other lighting effects I have in GIMP. Thanks for all the comments on the sigs C4.