Hardcore Holly/Dave Taylor

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Marcus Blade2

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
31
-Why did Hardocre holly go onto RAW. Wasn't he drafted from ECW to smackdown and now he magically appears on RAW. Holly could've probably have been in some use on Smackdown. In stead of fueding with Cody Rhodes on RAW.

- All I have to say about Dave Taylor is why is he still on the roster? He hasn't been in action and he hasn't even have a promo. I'm thinking that WWE will release him very soon.
A better solution is not to make William Regal General Manager of RAW and make him go back on Smackdown so he can form a team with Dave again and go for the Tag Titles on Smackdown Instead of Duece and Domino hogging the spotlight.
 

imported_Loki

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Age
43
Location
905 canada
hmmm.... as for holly... i dont really like him that much but i agree he would be a great addition to the smackdown roster because they really need him.... as for dave talor i think they should just release him.... william regal is a good gm and should stay on raw
 

Kaedon

Active Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
2,855
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
43
Because they are both decent/good/sometimes great wrestlers who can be used to bring up new stars, and not just by young guys getting wins, but by being in the ring with them and paying their dues and learning how to work a match.
 

MJ807

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
727
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
38
Location
Miami, Florida
Yeah basically what Kaedon said they are good wrestlers who can put younger wrestlers over and make them look a lot better than they are. Thats why they are still on this roster and they should stay. Its not like the WWE doesnt have enough money to pay them.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
112
Location
PA, US
Holly is inury prone, and bland as all hell. Even veterans who are used to typically put over younger talent have some kind of personality, which I think is essential in a WWE enviornment.
 

chavoheat

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
46
Holly isn't like the other veterans who will put younger wrestlers over because it's the right thing to do.

Holly is just as likely to injure a young wrestler out of bitterness more than anything else.
 

OrtonIsGod

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
36
Holly really needs to be on Smackdown. He seems like a perfect opponent for MVP. The grizzled vet agains the cocky up and comer. I think the feud would at least be interesting. Once MVP retains against Hardy, this would be a logical next step.

I just don't see a lot of opportunity for good programs with Holly on Raw.