MikeRaw
Guest
Pretty self explanitory.
And the poll doesnt have any answers like "Both are equal" so just post your gut feeling. Even if its only a SMALL difference, just choose whose the bigger legend.
Ill go with Flair. I was think Taker but thought of a few things to let me choose Flair:
-Flair was more active. Up until his huge push now, Undertaker would hardly appear, except or a big feud. And when he did, he usually only wrestled on PPVs...
-Longevity. Flair is like, 58 and Taker is 42. Im pretty sure we can all agree that Undertaker wont be around another 16 years.
-Legacy.... More titles for Flair, but more than just that, he introduced so much more to set the stage for modern wretling as far as gimmicks, and interview styles and charisma.
Also, when you post. since there isnt two polls, in your post, answer not who you think is a bigger legend, but who you LIKE as a superstar better.
And the poll doesnt have any answers like "Both are equal" so just post your gut feeling. Even if its only a SMALL difference, just choose whose the bigger legend.
Ill go with Flair. I was think Taker but thought of a few things to let me choose Flair:
-Flair was more active. Up until his huge push now, Undertaker would hardly appear, except or a big feud. And when he did, he usually only wrestled on PPVs...
-Longevity. Flair is like, 58 and Taker is 42. Im pretty sure we can all agree that Undertaker wont be around another 16 years.
-Legacy.... More titles for Flair, but more than just that, he introduced so much more to set the stage for modern wretling as far as gimmicks, and interview styles and charisma.
Also, when you post. since there isnt two polls, in your post, answer not who you think is a bigger legend, but who you LIKE as a superstar better.