Eddie got mentioned in that intro but Chris didnt

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


BrockLesnarFanForLife

The Lunatic Fringe
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
265
Points
0
Location
Manchester, England
Website
twitter.com
At the start of Raw where that package was first to air and they showed a clip of HHH crying and saing something about Eddie and this got me thinking there was no mention of any kind about Chris Benoit just goes to show Chris never excisted in WWE what he did by murdering his family has wiped him from WWE memory forever and so he should he doesnt deserve any exposure. Some people will still say he was the greatest technical wrestler of all time but take that away and all you will see is a murderer. Just thought id say this. Im glad Eddie got a mention in the intro as he was a huge part of WWE just a shame he died the way he did
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
no shit sherlock

I don't remember them naming Owen, Pillman, Umaga, or a bunch of other guys either.
 

GrammarNazi82

Lovable Kind of Filthy
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
20,928
Reaction score
4,879
Points
0
Location
Alabama
BrockLesnarFanForLife said:
...has wiped him from WWE memory forever and so he should he doesnt deserve any exposure.

Yet here he is, getting exposure by his lack of exposure on TV being mentioned in a forum.

:facepalm1:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowman1

Ironman666

Jobber
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
160
Reaction score
14
Points
0
Benoit deserves no recognition whatsoever he's a cowardly piece of shit that is better of dead

Fuck him
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Benoit deserves no recognition for his success etc. - He never will be recognised again for a selling point...
However things that aren't for marketing things he can be mentioned.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Jonathan said:
Benoit deserves no recognition for his success etc. - He never will be recognised again for a selling point...
However things that aren't for marketing things he can be mentioned.

That didn't make sense. Benoit will not be mentioned by WWE.
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Crayo said:
That didn't make sense. Benoit will not be mentioned by WWE.

Benoit has already been mentioned since what happened.


As long as it's not to gain something (i.e. a Benoit DVD generating money) they're allowed to say it, but not encouraged to.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
I'm pretty sure they can mention Benoit when ever they want, it's just bad publicity to do so, which they obviously want to avoid. Feel free to link me to where it says it's only if it's for profit however, I'm always open to learning new things.

"It's not right to pretend he didn't exist.

It's one thing to include him as part of a historical perspective, which I believe is okay, and it's another thing to promote him, which is not okay.

The situation is very similar to that of O.J. Simpson—despite his controversy, O.J. was still a part of the NFL scene. You can't deny that he existed."

http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/news/240843

This quote says for example they choose not to promote him, not that they can't.
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Seabs said:
I'm pretty sure they can mention Benoit when ever they want, it's just bad publicity to do so, which they obviously want to avoid. Feel free to link me to where it says it's only if it's for profit however, I'm always open to learning new things.



http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/news/240843

This quote says for example they choose not to promote him, not that they can't.

That's what I meant.

Thanks for finding that. I knew I read it along those lines. :dawg:
 

mark_htfc

Champion
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
1,727
Reaction score
68
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, England
I think the difference here between Eddie and Benoit is that Eddie died of natural causes, and Benoit was on steroids before getting warped in the head, eventually going on to kill his family and himself.

I think the main reason Benoit isn't mentioned is because steroids (at least I'm sure it was) played a bit part in his downfall and eventual suicide, and with the WWE suspended superstars for using them now, and trying to get away from the image, they try not to bring up the past of steroid abuse.
 

seabs

Walking the King’s Road
Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
39,124
Reaction score
5,642
Points
118
Age
30
Location
God's Country, Sheffield UK
mark_htfc said:
I think the difference here between Eddie and Benoit is that Eddie died of natural causes, and Benoit was on steroids before getting warped in the head, eventually going on to kill his family and himself.

I think the main reason Benoit isn't mentioned is because steroids (at least I'm sure it was) played a bit part in his downfall and eventual suicide, and with the WWE suspended superstars for using them now, and trying to get away from the image, they try not to bring up the past of steroid abuse.

If he had committed suicide only, I believe he would have still been mentioned but he committed two murders, that's PR suicide amongst morally incorrect IMO.