THE Brian Kendrick's Biceps
Guest
After Backlash's 12 Diva Tag Match, I was thinking about the status of the amount of diva's in the WWE, and what should be done with the divas. I mean, should they really be put on all three brands?
I don't think they should be. I would rather see them all on the one brand, with the Women's Championship. I don't really care which brand, but I don't think that matters.
Is there really a point in having divas on every brand? Do men just watching wrestling to see some T&A? Obviously not. If they wanted that, they would go watch porn. Sure they like it, but not having it on every show won't drive anyone away.
If all on one brand, the divas could be given a chance to *gasp* wrestle, rather than just be in bikini contests, or dance offs on SmackDown or ECW. I mean call me crazy, but I thought the divas were employed in a wrestling company.
Some people may think if all divas were on one brand, there would be too many divas. Well then we can get firing. If WWE headed in a more wrestling direction with the divas, something tells me Kelly Kelly would be the first to go. I also couldn't see Eve or Layla being around much longer. This would actually help women's wrestling, as people watching would realise, hey, they can wrestle. You can't tell me that Kelly, Eve or Layla are employed for the purpose of wrestling anyway.
With more divas chasing the title, we wouldn't have to see Beth Phoenix vs Mickie James for the billionth time. We could actually see some fresh feuds and match ups. Women's Championship reigns could be longer, as they could defend against more opposition, rather than just having to drop the belt because they have no-one to defend it against.
This is just a thought I had. I know that it is something that probably will never happen in WWE. And I know a little T&A never hurt anyone. But I would still rather the divas be athletes.
Thoughts?
I don't think they should be. I would rather see them all on the one brand, with the Women's Championship. I don't really care which brand, but I don't think that matters.
Is there really a point in having divas on every brand? Do men just watching wrestling to see some T&A? Obviously not. If they wanted that, they would go watch porn. Sure they like it, but not having it on every show won't drive anyone away.
If all on one brand, the divas could be given a chance to *gasp* wrestle, rather than just be in bikini contests, or dance offs on SmackDown or ECW. I mean call me crazy, but I thought the divas were employed in a wrestling company.
Some people may think if all divas were on one brand, there would be too many divas. Well then we can get firing. If WWE headed in a more wrestling direction with the divas, something tells me Kelly Kelly would be the first to go. I also couldn't see Eve or Layla being around much longer. This would actually help women's wrestling, as people watching would realise, hey, they can wrestle. You can't tell me that Kelly, Eve or Layla are employed for the purpose of wrestling anyway.
With more divas chasing the title, we wouldn't have to see Beth Phoenix vs Mickie James for the billionth time. We could actually see some fresh feuds and match ups. Women's Championship reigns could be longer, as they could defend against more opposition, rather than just having to drop the belt because they have no-one to defend it against.
This is just a thought I had. I know that it is something that probably will never happen in WWE. And I know a little T&A never hurt anyone. But I would still rather the divas be athletes.
Thoughts?