Culinary Union Calls On NSAC To Adopt “Bill of Rightsâ€￾ For MMA fighters

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


No More Sorrow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Messages
8,942
Reaction score
41
Points
48
Age
33
Location
Connecticut
LAS VEGAS — The Culinary Union, who has been the primary antagonist to getting MMA legalized in New York has taken yet another shot at Zuffa and the UFC.

Today, a representative for Culinary Workers Union, Local 226 went before the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) in Las Vegas and gave testimony outlining what they call exploitative business practices within the sport. They called on the commission to adopt a â€Bill of Rights for Professional Mixed-Martial Artists†comparable to the protection pro boxers currently receive under the Professional Boxers Bill of Rights and the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act.

Chris Serres, a research analyst with the Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, said:

“Many athletes who compete in the sport of mixed-martial arts are subject to coercive contracts and exploitative business practices that are not allowed in professional boxing. We call on the Nevada Athletic Commission to take a leadership role and push for the adoption of this ‘Bill of Rights’ in every state where it is currently legal to hold mixed-martial arts events. If adopted and enforced, these ten rights would change the sport’s most egregious business practices.â€

During his testimony before the NSAC today, Serres said they spoke with more than 50 professional MMA fighters and their agents and many of them feel exploited and undervalued, and in general, struggle against the following abuses:

a) Long-term, exclusivity contracts that bind an athlete to a single promoter, in some cases indefinitely. Some contracts contain “automatic renewal†provisions or a “champion’s clause,†which automatically extends the contract of a fighter who becomes a champion.4 Such clauses make it more difficult for athletes to negotiate higher pay and diminish the incentive of smaller promoters to bid for talented fighters.

b) Limited control over image and likeness rights. Some contracts with promoters require an athlete to relinquish rights to his own image and likeness in perpetuity, or forever. The fighter must agree to forfeit future revenue streams from DVD sales, video games, clothing and other merchandising, even after retirement.

c) Lack of financial transparency. Under the Ali Act, promoters are required to make extensive financial disclosures to state athletic commissions, including copies of all written agreements with boxers participating in a match. No such requirements govern MMA under federal law or Nevada law. As a result, MMA fighters often have to negotiate in the dark and are unsure if they are being compensated fairly.

MMAWeekly.com
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Wait am I reading this right, does it really say Culinary Union? Can't stand unions in general and I can't believe that they want to cost the city of New York and those that live there the revenue that will come from having UFC events in NY
 

Slim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
101
Points
63
Location
In your girl's closet
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
newageoutlaws
Favorite Wrestler
tara
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Favorite Wrestler
wyattfamily
New York is dumb. End of story.