Cookie Puss VS Rock Vs Cena?

[catlady]

The way the story is playing out...
For some reason...
I can see this turning from CM Punk vs Rock to Rock vs Cena, again, at WM. Like I can see Rock getting the belt off of Punk and Cena getting it off of Rock at WM. I don't "want" this to happen, but I have a feeling that is what it is leaning towards.

What do you guys think?

 

[CM Punk]

They're probably going to head that way.
I want it to have Punk retain at the Rumble, The Rock wins at Elimination Chamber and at Wrestlemania there is a triple threat between Cena Vs. The Rock. Vs CM Punk

 

[Danielson]

I wouldn't mind it. As long as cookie puss, loses the championship eventually, to someone that will remain on the wwe Roster. Anything is cool with me.

 

[catlady]

I just don't want it to be all about the Rock and Cena again... That match was such a let down imo.

 

[CM Punk]

I just don't want it to be all about the Rock and Cena again... That match was such a let down imo.

Either throw Punk in the mix or add a gimmick to the match.
Don't want to see the same shit we saw last year.

 

[catlady]

Either throw Punk in the mix or add a gimmick to the match.
Don't want to see the same shit we saw last year.

Yeah that would be good.
No more "Once in a life time" let downs PLEASE! :angry:

 

[Swift]

The obvious route seems to be
>Rock beats Punk @ RR
>Rock/Cena II @Mania

Which I don't want to see happen. I still think Punk will retain against Rock somehow, not sure what will happen after that though.
I'd honestly prefer Brock/Rock @ Mania for the title. I know it's not a popular choice, but even as part timers it would make the TITLE match seem really fucking important and special.
Cena can be SuperCena and beat the winner afterwards, he's the one who's going to end up with the title in the end anyway. Eh.

 

[kenharkey7]

I'll make this as simple as possible. All sources are leading me to believe that rock will go over punk at rumble (quick pr) then cena over rock at mania. This is the dumbest thing I've hard. Punks title reign is better pr then rock having the belt for a couple months. I would even have no issue really with it being cena over punk at mania if it means punk retains at rumble. Bottom line is if rock beats punk at rumble I'll be strictly tna for the foreseeable future.

Plus add in a possible taker vs punk mania and this whole thing just sucks

Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Swift]

Taker/Punk just sounds really to me. Lol if Punk were to win that match.

 

[BaraaKhalaf92]

I hope it won't happen this way, it will be too predictable and I don't want to see Cena/Rock again...

It wasn't even that special last year and it didn't live up to the hype, yet they are sticking with it, I just don't get why they are ignoring all the great matches they can have at WM just to book HHH/Brock & Rock/Cena again.

What is so special about these 2 matches?

 

[Swift]

What is so special about these 2 matches?

$

 

[kenharkey7]

Rock vs Cena...once in a life time....again. forget they already wrestled, it was just a dream like hhh vs undertaker

Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk 2

 

[acailler]

Or....Maybe....

ROCK v PUNK v CENA?

 

[Senhor Perfect]

I'll make this as simple as possible. All sources are leading me to believe that rock will go over punk at rumble (quick pr) then cena over rock at mania. This is the dumbest thing I've hard. Punks title reign is better pr then rock having the belt for a couple months. I would even have no issue really with it being cena over punk at mania if it means punk retains at rumble. Bottom line is if rock beats punk at rumble I'll be strictly tna for the foreseeable future.

Plus add in a possible taker vs punk mania and this whole thing just sucks

Sent from my LG-VM670 using Tapatalk 2

Going to have to disagree with you there. Rocky is a world known mega star, Punk is not. The belt on Rock for 5 minutes will get more mainstream attention than if Punk held it for 2 years. I posted a snippet a few days ago saying Punk retains at RR but then loses it at EC. This to me makes the most sense because Punk (you`re champ for over a year) doesn`t get buried by a part timer. He can lose the title without being pinned, and remain looking strong.

__________

Going to have to disagree with you there. Rocky is a world known mega star, Punk is not. The belt on Rock for 5 minutes will get more mainstream attention than if Punk held it for 2 years. I posted a snippet a few days ago saying Punk retains at RR but then loses it at EC. This to me makes the most sense because Punk (you`re champ for over a year) doesn`t get buried by a part timer. He can lose the title without being pinned, and remain looking strong.

 

[Leo C]

Basically, there's two possible WM matches that could happen. Either Rock vs Cena or Rock vs Cena vs Punk. In the first one, Rock beats Punk at RR and faces Cena at WM, in a crappy match that will draw buys from the casuals, make Vince happy and give Cena his oh so needed win back vs the Rock and another extremely, extremely entertaining John Cena WWE title reign. The Triple Threat would come from a scenario where Punk retains at the Rumble, at least in my opinion. Then Cena wins at WM too. I'd really rather the Triple Threat as I don't want to see Rock as the champ and I don't want Cena/Rock again, so I'd go with that.