Cole

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


DarksideTrin

This meal is so unfinished EA tried to publish it!
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
149
Points
0
I must say that I am more than Impressed with Cole lately.

It seems that he is evolving.:youdontsay:

Dont get me wrong. I had no issues with the Cole of Old. I actually liked the Cole mine.
I have read on here before that he is becoming more of a tweener. I think I like this Cole most of all. He is rarely off in his calls and he has shifted into more of a promote the talent more then himself mode.

I couldnt be happier!


Also, sorry I havent been on much as of late. I have had a very long last month. I just currently went on stress leave at work. Long story.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
He's one of the best commentators in WWE. You can see that by how he carries that fat pervert Jerry Lawler. I think they needed to turn him to a tweener. One, he's better at it, two, you can't have a mega-heel commentating play-by-play, it'll just piss everyone off.

Cole was astonishing in that Lesnar vs Cena match, that's one of my favourite matches that he's called. I just wish they would kick Lawler off the team and add Scott Stanford as the play-by-play. Their banter would be great and Scott is a great play-by-play announcer.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
I like Cole at times, but he needs to be doing color commentary. He isn't really a play by play guy. Obviously Lawler needs to gtfo, but the only person with a vote disagrees with everyone else on Earth.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
Cole as a tweener makes sense, he's an OK play-by-play guy. A lead announcer who's also a heel doesn't work, so I'm glad he's focusing more on matches instead of putting himself over. As far as Lawler goes... does Vince really think he's that necessary? Because I heard someone talking about Lawler's position, he's never screamed at by management, doesn't give a damn about the product, shows up on monday to do his job and doesn't even watch SD. Vince won't scream at him because he's afraid he'll quit. But why is Vince afraid of him quitting? He's not doing a good job.
 

Asskicker

Champion
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
5,353
Reaction score
151
Points
0
Age
27
Website
www.youtube.com
Matt Striker and Cole. Don't get me wrong Stanford is good too but Striker just has the enthusiasm in his voice when commentating which could make moments gold.
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Thewindyfan said:
Matt Striker and Cole. Don't get me wrong Stanford is good too but Striker just has the enthusiasm in his voice when commentating which could make moments gold.

Tweener and Tweener? No. Striker is a heel or tweener commentator. You need a super face to do play-by-play. Stanford > Anyone.
 

Asskicker

Champion
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
5,353
Reaction score
151
Points
0
Age
27
Website
www.youtube.com
We could make Striker a super face commentator. He'd be just as good or in fact better than Stanford. I rather have Stanford on Smackdown to make Smackdown at least feel important.
 

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
I don't think Cole (and Lawler) like working with Striker. I head they were complaining about him being an attention whore or something... I loved his smarky commentary. :upset: