Cm punk declines Paul Hayman

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Inpunkwetrust

Jobber
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
39
Paul Hayman asked Cm Punk a question on smack-down regarding the raw MITB ladder match. Cm punk told Hayman that he is not his client and that he is his friend and he will not be at ringside during the ladder match.

Do you think this is a wise decision by Punk or do you think otherwise? leave your thoughts.
 

Lady Deathbane

thanks for the unban, lmao
Joined
Oct 4, 2012
Messages
16,848
Reaction score
2,391
Points
118
Location
Bay Area 51, CA
Website
www.instagram.com
It seems as though Punk is losing his trust on Heyman. It depends on your opinion of Heyman whether or not it is a good decision to make. I personally love Heyman; however, I do think Punk is good enough to stand on his own.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Union City, Tennessee
If wrasslin was real and I was in CM Punk's shoes, I would still be somewhat leery of Heyman and wouldn't want him in my corner based on the fact that he could screw me by tipping over the ladder when I'm on it. Heyman gave a speech where he swore on his children that despite being a habitual liar, he was telling the truth when he said he had nothing to do with Brock attacking Punk. And I personally wouldn't believe a second of it considering the week before, Mark Henry swore on not just his kids but his wife and his whole family that he was retiring, only to reveal he was lying just a few minutes later... and yet Punk believes Heyman, a man who has a reputation for bold faced lies?

I think it'd be nice if when the reveal that Heyman was in cahoots with Brock happens, if Punk said he still had doubts the whole time, even after Heyman's explanation on Raw. Otherwise, Punk not wanting Heyman to be at ringside is just Punk wanting to stand on his own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aids Johnson

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Punk's character is fairly certain that Heyman sent Brock after him, but he doesn't want to come out and accuse Heyman of that because they are pals. He is trying to distance himself from Heyman without outright saying 'UP YOURS ASSHOLE I KNOW YOU SENT BROCK OUT TO FUCK ME UP!'
 

Chaz

The Artiste
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
173
Reaction score
60
Points
0
Age
31
Well Punk doesn't need Heyman at all so I don't really see this as a bad thing. As Punk said himself, guys like Axel & Brock need him as a mouthpiece, Punk is off perfectly without Heyman though. And if he's just ''a friend'' and not a manager why would he be at ringside anyways lmao.